Reported Reactions

Devices › Prosthesis, intervertebral disc

Device brand name · Artificial cervical disc

M6-C: medical device reports filed with FDA

452 reports name it, 2019–2026. Manufacturer given most often on reports: Spinal Kinetics. Product code MJO.

452
device reports naming the brand
0% of all MAUDE reports · about 62 a year
31
reports, 12 months to August 2026
17 in the 12 months before
6.6%
classified as malfunction
17.2% across the product code
0%
classified as death, as reported
0 reports · not verified by FDA

452 medical device reports received by FDA name the brand "M6-C" (artificial cervical disc); the manufacturer given most often on reports is Spinal Kinetics; received from March 2019 to August 2026. Brand names are as the reporter or manufacturer wrote them, so one product can appear under several spellings.

31 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, up 82% from 17 in the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are injury (93.4%) and malfunction (6.6%); across all prosthesis, intervertebral disc reports (product code MJO) death is recorded in 0.2% and malfunction in 17.2%. Event type is the reporter's classification of the report, not a verified outcome.

The device problems coded most often are insufficient device problem information (52.7%), patient-device incompatibility (39.4%) and patient device interaction problem (13.9%). The patient problems coded most often are osteolysis, neck pain and pain. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Reports by month, five years

0917Sep 2021: 6Oct 2021: 8Nov 2021: 6Dec 2021: 22022Jan 2022: 4Feb 2022: 17Mar 2022: 10Apr 2022: 4May 2022: 10Jun 2022: 8Jul 2022: 3Aug 2022: 1Sep 2022: 8Oct 2022: 4Nov 2022: 7Dec 2022: 52023Jan 2023: 5Feb 2023: 3Mar 2023: 5Apr 2023: 8May 2023: 9Jun 2023: 7Jul 2023: 11Aug 2023: 9Sep 2023: 4Oct 2023: 3Nov 2023: 4Dec 2023: 42024Jan 2024: 3Feb 2024: 4Mar 2024: 2Apr 2024: 8May 2024: 5Jun 2024: 8Jul 2024: 0Aug 2024: 1Sep 2024: 1Oct 2024: 1Nov 2024: 1Dec 2024: 12025Jan 2025: 0Feb 2025: 2Mar 2025: 6Apr 2025: 2May 2025: 0Jun 2025: 2Jul 2025: 1Aug 2025: 0Sep 2025: 0Oct 2025: 5Nov 2025: 4Dec 2025: 32026Jan 2026: 3Feb 2026: 2Mar 2026: 1Apr 2026: 2May 2026: 4Jun 2026: 1Jul 2026: 2Aug 2026: 4

Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases.

By year received

047932019: 5420192020: 7320202021: 9320212022: 8120222023: 7220232024: 3520242025: 2520252026: 192026

Event type and report source

Event type, as classified on the report

Death0%0
Injury93.4%422
Malfunction6.6%30
Other0%0
Not given0%0

Who filed the report

Manufacturer report99.8%451
Voluntary report0.2%1
User facility report0%0
Distributor report0%0
Not given0%0

Grey bar: all 6,183 reports carrying product code MJO. Event type is the filer's classification and is not verified by FDA.

Device problems coded

Device problem (FDA code)ReportsShareShare across product code
Insufficient device problem information23852.7%14.2%
Patient-device incompatibilitythe device did not suit the patient17839.4%4.1%
Patient device interaction problem6313.9%2.6%
Collapse5913.1%1.6%
Loosening of implant not related to bone-ingrowth112.4%0.7%
Migrationthe device moved from where it was placed61.3%6.4%
Fracturea broken bone51.1%1.5%
Loss of osseointegration51.1%0.1%
Off-label use30.7%0.2%
Failure to osseointegrate20.4%0.1%
Improper or incorrect procedure or method20.4%1.1%
Malposition of device20.4%3.3%
Material disintegration20.4%0%
Material integrity problema problem with the device material20.4%0.1%
Material separation20.4%0.9%
Mechanical problema mechanical problem20.4%1.2%
Osseointegration problem20.4%1.1%
Structural problem20.4%0%
Breakthe device broke10.2%2.7%
Compatibility problem10.2%0.1%

FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report; one report can carry several. Generic codes such as "no apparent adverse event" are left out.

Patient problems coded

Patient problem (FDA code)ReportsShare
Osteolysis11926.3%
Neck painneck pain8418.6%
Painpain, site not specified6213.7%
Dysphagia/ odynophagia143.1%
Failure of implant143.1%
Inflammationinflammation92%
Abscessa collection of pus81.8%
Falla fall81.8%
Numbnessnumbness81.8%
Implant pain61.3%
Inadequate pain relief51.1%
Appropriate clinical signs, symptoms and conditions term/code not available40.9%
Discomfortdiscomfort40.9%
Muscle weakness/atrophy40.9%
Dysphasia30.7%

Patient problem codes are present mainly in reports filed since 2019 and are often blank.

In context

MeasureM6-CProduct code MJOAll MAUDE reports
Reports4526,18326,136,888
Share of that pool—7.3%0%
Classified as death, per 1,000 reports029
Classified as injury93.4%82.2%36.2%
Classified as malfunction6.6%17.2%62.3%
Filed by the manufacturer99.8%95.7%94.9%

Shares are of reports, not of devices in use. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Other brands with product code MJO

BrandReportsLatest 12 monthsClassified as death
PRESTIGE Cervical Disc System275200.4%
Bryan Cervical Disc System26100.4%
Charite Artificial Disc Size Unknown16101.2%
Collect No Qas Spine Anterior Stabilis26900%

Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA also states that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product."

Questions about M6-C reports

How many FDA reports name M6-C?

452 medical device reports in the openFDA MAUDE release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through August 2026; 31 in the latest 12 months.

What kinds of events are reported?

injury (93.4%) and malfunction (6.6%). "Event type" is how the report was classified when filed: death, injury, malfunction or other.

What device problems are coded?

insufficient device problem information (52.7%), patient-device incompatibility (39.4%), patient device interaction problem (13.9%), collapse (13.1%) and loosening of implant not related to bone-ingrowth (2.4%). These are FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report.

Who files these reports?

manufacturer reports (99.8%) and voluntary reports (0.2%). Manufacturers and user facilities are required to report; voluntary reports come from health professionals and the public.

Do these reports show that M6-C was at fault?

No. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA adds that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report."

How do I report a problem with a medical device?

Through FDA MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 for health professionals and consumers), or to the manufacturer. See the guide on how to report.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. A report counts here when any device it lists carries this brand name after punctuation and capitalisation are normalised. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.