Reported Reactions

Devices › System, endovascular graft, arteriovenous (av) dialysis access circuit stenosis treatment

Device brand name · Vascular stent graft

Fluency Plus Vascular Stent Graft: medical device reports filed with FDA

736 reports name it, 2017–2026. Manufacturer given most often on reports: Angiomed & Medizintechnik Kg. Product code PFV.

736
device reports naming the brand
0% of all MAUDE reports · about 81 a year
64
reports, 12 months to August 2026
43 in the 12 months before
92%
classified as malfunction
68.3% across the product code
0.4%
classified as death, as reported
3 reports · not verified by FDA

736 medical device reports received by FDA name the brand "Fluency Plus Vascular Stent Graft" (vascular stent graft); the manufacturer given most often on reports is Angiomed & Medizintechnik Kg; received from June 2017 to August 2026. Brand names are as the reporter or manufacturer wrote them, so one product can appear under several spellings.

64 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, up 49% from 43 in the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are malfunction (92%), injury (7.6%) and death (0.4%); across all system, endovascular graft, arteriovenous (av) dialysis access circuit stenosis treatment reports (product code PFV) death is recorded in 1.1% and malfunction in 68.3%. Event type is the reporter's classification of the report, not a verified outcome.

The device problems coded most often are misfire (62.5%), positioning failure (49.5%) and fracture (45%). The patient problems coded most often are hemorrhage/blood loss/bleeding, appropriate clinical signs, symptoms and conditions term/code not available and no patient involvement. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Reports by month, five years

0815Sep 2021: 12Oct 2021: 10Nov 2021: 7Dec 2021: 132022Jan 2022: 6Feb 2022: 15Mar 2022: 7Apr 2022: 8May 2022: 7Jun 2022: 12Jul 2022: 7Aug 2022: 1Sep 2022: 8Oct 2022: 2Nov 2022: 9Dec 2022: 52023Jan 2023: 6Feb 2023: 11Mar 2023: 6Apr 2023: 8May 2023: 6Jun 2023: 5Jul 2023: 6Aug 2023: 5Sep 2023: 3Oct 2023: 4Nov 2023: 7Dec 2023: 42024Jan 2024: 7Feb 2024: 0Mar 2024: 7Apr 2024: 6May 2024: 6Jun 2024: 6Jul 2024: 13Aug 2024: 6Sep 2024: 0Oct 2024: 5Nov 2024: 3Dec 2024: 12025Jan 2025: 4Feb 2025: 2Mar 2025: 7Apr 2025: 3May 2025: 4Jun 2025: 4Jul 2025: 3Aug 2025: 7Sep 2025: 5Oct 2025: 5Nov 2025: 7Dec 2025: 42026Jan 2026: 3Feb 2026: 6Mar 2026: 5Apr 2026: 5May 2026: 7Jun 2026: 7Jul 2026: 5Aug 2026: 5

Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases.

By year received

0551102017: 5420172018: 7820182019: 8720192020: 9120202021: 11020212022: 8720222023: 7120232024: 6020242025: 5520252026: 432026

Event type and report source

Event type, as classified on the report

Death0.4%3
Injury7.6%56
Malfunction92%677
Other0%0
Not given0%0

Who filed the report

Manufacturer report100%736
Voluntary report0%0
User facility report0%0
Distributor report0%0
Not given0%0

Grey bar: all 2,762 reports carrying product code PFV. Event type is the filer's classification and is not verified by FDA.

Device problems coded

Device problem (FDA code)ReportsShareShare across product code
Misfire46062.5%30.3%
Positioning failure36449.5%31.4%
Fracturea broken bone33145%20.8%
Breakthe device broke11115.1%13.5%
Detachment of device or device componentpart of the device came off506.8%6.8%
Difficult to removethe device was hard to remove446%3.1%
Material deformation415.6%6.4%
Retraction problem354.8%2.1%
Difficult or delayed positioning243.3%2.8%
Activation failure223%6.1%
Material perforation223%5.6%
Malposition of device182.4%3.2%
Positioning problem182.4%1.6%
Difficult to advance131.8%1.6%
Obstruction of flow121.6%4.8%
Device-device incompatibility101.4%0.8%
Failure to advance91.2%1.3%
Entrapment of device60.8%1.1%
Material invagination50.7%0.8%
Activation, positioning or separation problem40.5%1.4%

FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report; one report can carry several. Generic codes such as "no apparent adverse event" are left out.

Patient problems coded

Patient problem (FDA code)ReportsShare
Hemorrhage/blood loss/bleeding101.4%
Appropriate clinical signs, symptoms and conditions term/code not available91.2%
No patient involvement81.1%
Injurya physical injury71%
Thrombosis50.7%
Encephalopathy40.5%
Stenosis40.5%
Thrombosis/thrombus40.5%
Aneurysm30.4%
Occlusion30.4%
Perforation of vessels30.4%
Restenosis30.4%
Abscessa collection of pus20.3%
Deaththe patient died; cause not stated by this term20.3%
Device embedded in tissue or plaque20.3%

Patient problem codes are present mainly in reports filed since 2019 and are often blank.

In context

MeasureFluency Plus Vascular Stent GraftProduct code PFVAll MAUDE reports
Reports7362,76226,136,888
Share of that pool—26.6%0%
Classified as death, per 1,000 reports4119
Classified as injury7.6%30.6%36.2%
Classified as malfunction92%68.3%62.3%
Filed by the manufacturer100%99.4%94.9%

Shares are of reports, not of devices in use. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Other brands with product code PFV

BrandReportsLatest 12 monthsClassified as death
Fluency Plus Endovascular Stent Graft635350.6%
Gore Viabahn Endoprosthesis - 335403.1%
Covera Vascular Covered Stent338420.3%
GORE VIABAHN Endoprosthesis985185.8%
GORE VIABAHN Endoprosthesis with HEPARIN Bioactive Surface9061742.1%
Flair Endovascular Stent Graft37500.3%
GORE VIABAHN Endoprosthesis with PROPATEN Bioactive Surface341910.6%

Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA also states that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product."

Questions about Fluency Plus Vascular Stent Graft reports

How many FDA reports name Fluency Plus Vascular Stent Graft?

736 medical device reports in the openFDA MAUDE release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through August 2026; 64 in the latest 12 months.

What kinds of events are reported?

malfunction (92%), injury (7.6%) and death (0.4%). "Event type" is how the report was classified when filed: death, injury, malfunction or other.

What device problems are coded?

misfire (62.5%), positioning failure (49.5%), fracture (45%), break (15.1%) and detachment of device or device component (6.8%). These are FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report.

Who files these reports?

manufacturer reports (100%). Manufacturers and user facilities are required to report; voluntary reports come from health professionals and the public.

Do these reports show that Fluency Plus Vascular Stent Graft was at fault?

No. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA adds that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report."

How do I report a problem with a medical device?

Through FDA MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 for health professionals and consumers), or to the manufacturer. See the guide on how to report.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. A report counts here when any device it lists carries this brand name after punctuation and capitalisation are normalised. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.