Reported Reactions

Devices › Stimulator, spinal-cord, totally implanted for pain relief

Device brand name · Scs extension

Extension Dual 4 Channel 60cm: medical device reports filed with FDA

247 reports name it, 2011–2025. Manufacturer given most often on reports: St Jude Medical - Neuromodulation. Product code LGW.

247
device reports naming the brand
0% of all MAUDE reports · about 16 a year
2
reports, 12 months to August 2026
3 in the 12 months before
2%
classified as malfunction
27.3% across the product code
0%
classified as death, as reported
0 reports · not verified by FDA

FDA's MAUDE database holds 247 reports that name the brand "Extension Dual 4 Channel 60cm" (scs extension), received between April 2011 and September 2025; the manufacturer given most often on reports is St Jude Medical - Neuromodulation. Spellings of one product vary from report to report.

2 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, down 33% from 3 in the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are injury (98%) and malfunction (2%); across all stimulator, spinal-cord, totally implanted for pain relief reports (product code LGW) death is recorded in 0.5% and malfunction in 27.3%. Event type is the reporter's classification of the report, not a verified outcome.

The device problems coded most often are therapeutic or diagnostic output failure (15.8%), high impedance (10.9%) and impedance problem (8.9%). The patient problems coded most often are inadequate pain relief, post operative wound infection and pain. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Reports by month, five years

024Sep 2021: 0Oct 2021: 2Nov 2021: 0Dec 2021: 22022Jan 2022: 0Feb 2022: 0Mar 2022: 0Apr 2022: 2May 2022: 0Jun 2022: 0Jul 2022: 0Aug 2022: 3Sep 2022: 2Oct 2022: 0Nov 2022: 0Dec 2022: 22023Jan 2023: 0Feb 2023: 0Mar 2023: 2Apr 2023: 0May 2023: 2Jun 2023: 0Jul 2023: 4Aug 2023: 0Sep 2023: 0Oct 2023: 0Nov 2023: 2Dec 2023: 02024Jan 2024: 0Feb 2024: 0Mar 2024: 0Apr 2024: 0May 2024: 0Jun 2024: 2Jul 2024: 0Aug 2024: 0Sep 2024: 0Oct 2024: 1Nov 2024: 0Dec 2024: 02025Jan 2025: 0Feb 2025: 0Mar 2025: 0Apr 2025: 0May 2025: 0Jun 2025: 0Jul 2025: 2Aug 2025: 0Sep 2025: 2Oct 2025: 0Nov 2025: 0Dec 2025: 02026Jan 2026: 0Feb 2026: 0Mar 2026: 0Apr 2026: 0May 2026: 0Jun 2026: 0Jul 2026: 0Aug 2026: 0

Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases.

By year received

021422011: 2320112012: 182014: 520142015: 122016: 1320162017: 182018: 2220182019: 402020: 4220202021: 282022: 920222023: 102024: 320242025: 4

Event type and report source

Event type, as classified on the report

Death0%0
Injury98%242
Malfunction2%5
Other0%0
Not given0%0

Who filed the report

Manufacturer report100%247
Voluntary report0%0
User facility report0%0
Distributor report0%0
Not given0%0

Grey bar: all 378,355 reports carrying product code LGW. Event type is the filer's classification and is not verified by FDA.

Device problems coded

Device problem (FDA code)ReportsShareShare across product code
Therapeutic or diagnostic output failure3915.8%3.5%
High impedance2710.9%9.7%
Impedance problem228.9%1.9%
Fracturea broken bone208.1%1.8%
Device operates differently than expectedthe device behaved unexpectedly52%7.5%
Disconnection41.6%0.4%
Insufficient device problem information41.6%6.8%
No device output31.2%1.2%
Output problem31.2%0.1%
Communication or transmission problemthe device could not communicate or transmit20.8%5%
Loose or intermittent connection20.8%0%
Malposition of device20.8%1.3%
Therapy delivered to incorrect body area20.8%1.5%
Device remains activated10.4%0.1%
Device slipped10.4%0%
Device stops intermittentlythe device stopped now and then10.4%0.2%
Improper or incorrect procedure or method10.4%2.6%
Nonstandard device10.4%0.2%
Occlusion within devicethe device blocked10.4%0%

FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report; one report can carry several. Generic codes such as "no apparent adverse event" are left out.

Patient problems coded

Patient problem (FDA code)ReportsShare
Inadequate pain relief11144.9%
Post operative wound infection208.1%
Painpain, site not specified135.3%
Discomfortdiscomfort114.5%
Device overstimulation of tissue72.8%
Erosion62.4%
Impaired healingslow healing62.4%
Undesired nerve stimulation41.6%
Wound dehiscencea wound reopened41.6%
Burning sensationa burning feeling20.8%
Discharge20.8%
Implant pain20.8%
Neck painneck pain20.8%
Skin erosion20.8%
Falla fall10.4%

Patient problem codes are present mainly in reports filed since 2019 and are often blank.

In context

MeasureExtension Dual 4 Channel 60cmProduct code LGWAll MAUDE reports
Reports247378,35526,136,888
Share of that pool—0.1%0%
Classified as death, per 1,000 reports059
Classified as injury98%72%36.2%
Classified as malfunction2%27.3%62.3%
Filed by the manufacturer100%99.5%94.9%

Shares are of reports, not of devices in use. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Other brands with product code LGW

BrandReportsLatest 12 monthsClassified as death
Intellis42,0324,7430%
Octrode Lead Kit, 60cm Length47,0375,1330.1%
SureScan33,1234900%
Precision?26,0204460.4%
Proclaim 5 Elite Implantable Pulse Generator20,8162,0570.1%
Precision Spectra ?16,8589710.5%
Restore Ultra13,500390.1%
Eon Mini IPG, 16-Channel Rechargeable14,1761110.2%
Restore Sensor10,934400.1%
Spectra WaveWriter?7,7661,0930.4%
Penta 3mm Lead, 60 cm9,6178390.3%
Senza6,42371815.1%
Eon Mini9,12200.6%
Proclaim 7 Elite Implantable Pulse Generator5,8363330.1%
WaveWriter Alpha?4,9651,5910.9%

Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA also states that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product."

Questions about Extension Dual 4 Channel 60cm reports

How many FDA reports name Extension Dual 4 Channel 60cm?

247 medical device reports in the openFDA MAUDE release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through August 2026; 2 in the latest 12 months.

What kinds of events are reported?

injury (98%) and malfunction (2%). "Event type" is how the report was classified when filed: death, injury, malfunction or other.

What device problems are coded?

therapeutic or diagnostic output failure (15.8%), high impedance (10.9%), impedance problem (8.9%), fracture (8.1%) and device operates differently than expected (2%). These are FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report.

Who files these reports?

manufacturer reports (100%). Manufacturers and user facilities are required to report; voluntary reports come from health professionals and the public.

Do these reports show that Extension Dual 4 Channel 60cm was at fault?

No. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA adds that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report."

How do I report a problem with a medical device?

Through FDA MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 for health professionals and consumers), or to the manufacturer. See the guide on how to report.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. A report counts here when any device it lists carries this brand name after punctuation and capitalisation are normalised. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.