Reported Reactions

Devices › Stimulator, spinal-cord, totally implanted for pain relief

Device brand name · Scs extension

Extension, 60cm: medical device reports filed with FDA

398 reports name it, 2011–2026. Manufacturer given most often on reports: St Jude Medical - Neuromodulation. Product code LGW.

398
device reports naming the brand
0% of all MAUDE reports · about 26 a year
18
reports, 12 months to August 2026
21 in the 12 months before
1.5%
classified as malfunction
27.3% across the product code
0%
classified as death, as reported
0 reports · not verified by FDA

FDA's MAUDE database holds 398 reports that name the brand "Extension, 60cm" (scs extension), received between January 2011 and August 2026; the manufacturer given most often on reports is St Jude Medical - Neuromodulation. Spellings of one product vary from report to report.

18 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, down 14% from 21 in the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are injury (98.5%) and malfunction (1.5%); across all stimulator, spinal-cord, totally implanted for pain relief reports (product code LGW) death is recorded in 0.5% and malfunction in 27.3%. Event type is the reporter's classification of the report, not a verified outcome.

The device problems coded most often are high impedance (29.6%), impedance problem (11.1%) and therapeutic or diagnostic output failure (7.8%). The patient problems coded most often are inadequate pain relief, post operative wound infection and discomfort. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Reports by month, five years

036Sep 2021: 1Oct 2021: 2Nov 2021: 0Dec 2021: 42022Jan 2022: 0Feb 2022: 0Mar 2022: 0Apr 2022: 2May 2022: 2Jun 2022: 4Jul 2022: 1Aug 2022: 0Sep 2022: 2Oct 2022: 0Nov 2022: 0Dec 2022: 22023Jan 2023: 0Feb 2023: 0Mar 2023: 0Apr 2023: 2May 2023: 0Jun 2023: 2Jul 2023: 1Aug 2023: 0Sep 2023: 1Oct 2023: 2Nov 2023: 1Dec 2023: 02024Jan 2024: 0Feb 2024: 1Mar 2024: 1Apr 2024: 3May 2024: 4Jun 2024: 3Jul 2024: 0Aug 2024: 0Sep 2024: 1Oct 2024: 0Nov 2024: 1Dec 2024: 02025Jan 2025: 0Feb 2025: 2Mar 2025: 6Apr 2025: 1May 2025: 2Jun 2025: 6Jul 2025: 0Aug 2025: 2Sep 2025: 0Oct 2025: 0Nov 2025: 3Dec 2025: 02026Jan 2026: 0Feb 2026: 3Mar 2026: 4Apr 2026: 0May 2026: 2Jun 2026: 2Jul 2026: 0Aug 2026: 4

Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases.

By year received

030592011: 2220112012: 342014: 320142015: 312016: 3220162017: 272018: 4820182019: 592020: 4420202021: 252022: 1320222023: 92024: 1420242025: 222026: 152026

Event type and report source

Event type, as classified on the report

Death0%0
Injury98.5%392
Malfunction1.5%6
Other0%0
Not given0%0

Who filed the report

Manufacturer report100%398
Voluntary report0%0
User facility report0%0
Distributor report0%0
Not given0%0

Grey bar: all 378,355 reports carrying product code LGW. Event type is the filer's classification and is not verified by FDA.

Device problems coded

Device problem (FDA code)ReportsShareShare across product code
High impedance11829.6%9.7%
Impedance problem4411.1%1.9%
Therapeutic or diagnostic output failure317.8%3.5%
Device operates differently than expectedthe device behaved unexpectedly184.5%7.5%
Fracturea broken bone174.3%1.8%
Disconnection123%0.4%
Insufficient device problem information112.8%6.8%
Low impedance82%0.7%
Material twisted/bent51.3%0.1%
Breakthe device broke41%1.4%
Migrationthe device moved from where it was placed41%5.7%
Temperature problem41%1.5%
Detachment of device or device componentpart of the device came off20.5%0.1%
Failure to deliver energy20.5%4.4%
Improper or incorrect procedure or method20.5%2.6%
Material fragmentation20.5%0.1%
Material frayed20.5%0.2%
Therapy delivered to incorrect body area20.5%1.5%
Communication or transmission problemthe device could not communicate or transmit10.3%5%
Cut in material10.3%0%

FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report; one report can carry several. Generic codes such as "no apparent adverse event" are left out.

Patient problems coded

Patient problem (FDA code)ReportsShare
Inadequate pain relief23759.5%
Post operative wound infection358.8%
Discomfortdiscomfort184.5%
Painpain, site not specified143.5%
Erosion102.5%
Failure of implant92.3%
Falla fall61.5%
Implant pain51.3%
Wound dehiscencea wound reopened51.3%
Bacterial infectiona bacterial infection41%
Device overstimulation of tissue41%
Fluid discharge41%
Headachehead pain41%
Skin erosion41%
Staphylococcus aureus41%

Patient problem codes are present mainly in reports filed since 2019 and are often blank.

In context

MeasureExtension, 60cmProduct code LGWAll MAUDE reports
Reports398378,35526,136,888
Share of that pool—0.1%0%
Classified as death, per 1,000 reports059
Classified as injury98.5%72%36.2%
Classified as malfunction1.5%27.3%62.3%
Filed by the manufacturer100%99.5%94.9%

Shares are of reports, not of devices in use. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Other brands with product code LGW

BrandReportsLatest 12 monthsClassified as death
Intellis42,0324,7430%
Octrode Lead Kit, 60cm Length47,0375,1330.1%
SureScan33,1234900%
Precision?26,0204460.4%
Proclaim 5 Elite Implantable Pulse Generator20,8162,0570.1%
Precision Spectra ?16,8589710.5%
Restore Ultra13,500390.1%
Eon Mini IPG, 16-Channel Rechargeable14,1761110.2%
Restore Sensor10,934400.1%
Spectra WaveWriter?7,7661,0930.4%
Penta 3mm Lead, 60 cm9,6178390.3%
Senza6,42371815.1%
Eon Mini9,12200.6%
Proclaim 7 Elite Implantable Pulse Generator5,8363330.1%
WaveWriter Alpha?4,9651,5910.9%

Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA also states that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product."

Questions about Extension, 60cm reports

How many FDA reports name Extension, 60cm?

398 medical device reports in the openFDA MAUDE release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through August 2026; 18 in the latest 12 months.

What kinds of events are reported?

injury (98.5%) and malfunction (1.5%). "Event type" is how the report was classified when filed: death, injury, malfunction or other.

What device problems are coded?

high impedance (29.6%), impedance problem (11.1%), therapeutic or diagnostic output failure (7.8%), device operates differently than expected (4.5%) and fracture (4.3%). These are FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report.

Who files these reports?

manufacturer reports (100%). Manufacturers and user facilities are required to report; voluntary reports come from health professionals and the public.

Do these reports show that Extension, 60cm was at fault?

No. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA adds that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report."

How do I report a problem with a medical device?

Through FDA MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 for health professionals and consumers), or to the manufacturer. See the guide on how to report.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. A report counts here when any device it lists carries this brand name after punctuation and capitalisation are normalised. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.