Device brand name · Esteem ii product code oaf
Esteem: medical device reports filed with FDA
236 reports name it, 2013–2026. Manufacturer given most often on reports: Envoy Medical.
- 236
- device reports naming the brand
- 0% of all MAUDE reports · about 17 a year
- 12
- reports, 12 months to August 2026
- 11 in the 12 months before
- 27.5%
- classified as malfunction
- 62.3% across all reports
- 0%
- classified as death, as reported
- 0 reports · not verified by FDA
236 medical device reports received by FDA name the brand "Esteem" (esteem ii product code oaf); the manufacturer given most often on reports is Envoy Medical; received from January 2013 to July 2026. Brand names are as the reporter or manufacturer wrote them, so one product can appear under several spellings.
12 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, close to the 11 of the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are injury (49.6%), malfunction (27.5%) and other (22.9%). Event type is the reporter's classification of the report, not a verified outcome.
The device problems coded most often are insufficient device problem information (11.9%), device operates differently than expected (10.6%) and complete blockage (6.4%). The patient problems coded most often are wound dehiscence, hearing impairment and neurological deficit/dysfunction. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."
Reports by month, five years
Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases.
By year received
Event type and report source
Event type, as classified on the report
Who filed the report
Grey bar: all 26,136,888 MAUDE reports. Event type is the filer's classification and is not verified by FDA.
Device problems coded
| Device problem (FDA code) | Reports | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Insufficient device problem information | 28 | 11.9% |
| Device operates differently than expectedthe device behaved unexpectedly | 25 | 10.6% |
| Complete blockage | 15 | 6.4% |
| Melted | 15 | 6.4% |
| Premature discharge of battery | 14 | 5.9% |
| Device inoperablethe device could not be used | 11 | 4.7% |
| Electrical /electronic property probleman electrical or electronic problem | 7 | 3% |
| Incomplete or inadequate connection | 6 | 2.5% |
| Low impedance | 6 | 2.5% |
| Impedance problem | 5 | 2.1% |
| Patient device interaction problem | 5 | 2.1% |
| Improper or incorrect procedure or method | 4 | 1.7% |
| Patient-device incompatibilitythe device did not suit the patient | 4 | 1.7% |
| Battery problema problem with the battery | 2 | 0.8% |
| Device damaged by another device | 2 | 0.8% |
| Fluid/blood leak | 2 | 0.8% |
| Improper device output | 2 | 0.8% |
| Intermittent continuity | 2 | 0.8% |
| Material split, cut or torn | 2 | 0.8% |
| Physical property issue | 2 | 0.8% |
FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report; one report can carry several. Generic codes such as "no apparent adverse event" are left out.
Patient problems coded
| Patient problem (FDA code) | Reports | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Wound dehiscencea wound reopened | 39 | 16.5% |
| Hearing impairment | 31 | 13.1% |
| Neurological deficit/dysfunction | 17 | 7.2% |
| Post operative wound infection | 11 | 4.7% |
| Deafnesshearing loss | 9 | 3.8% |
| Discomfortdiscomfort | 8 | 3.4% |
| Partial hearing loss | 6 | 2.5% |
| Painpain, site not specified | 3 | 1.3% |
| Wound infectionan infected wound | 3 | 1.3% |
| Complaint, ill-defined | 2 | 0.8% |
| Feeding problem | 2 | 0.8% |
| Hemorrhage/blood loss/bleeding | 2 | 0.8% |
| Cellulitisa skin infection | 1 | 0.4% |
| Chillschills or shivering | 1 | 0.4% |
| Disability | 1 | 0.4% |
Patient problem codes are present mainly in reports filed since 2019 and are often blank.
In context
| Measure | Esteem | All MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|
| Reports | 236 | 26,136,888 |
| Share of that pool | — | 0% |
| Classified as death, per 1,000 reports | 0 | 9 |
| Classified as injury | 49.6% | 36.2% |
| Classified as malfunction | 27.5% | 62.3% |
| Filed by the manufacturer | 98.7% | 94.9% |
Shares are of reports, not of devices in use. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."
Questions about Esteem reports
How many FDA reports name Esteem?
236 medical device reports in the openFDA MAUDE release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through August 2026; 12 in the latest 12 months.
What kinds of events are reported?
injury (49.6%), malfunction (27.5%) and other (22.9%). "Event type" is how the report was classified when filed: death, injury, malfunction or other.
What device problems are coded?
insufficient device problem information (11.9%), device operates differently than expected (10.6%), complete blockage (6.4%), melted (6.4%) and premature discharge of battery (5.9%). These are FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report.
Who files these reports?
manufacturer reports (98.7%) and voluntary reports (0.8%). Manufacturers and user facilities are required to report; voluntary reports come from health professionals and the public.
Do these reports show that Esteem was at fault?
No. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA adds that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report."
How do I report a problem with a medical device?
Through FDA MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 for health professionals and consumers), or to the manufacturer. See the guide on how to report.
Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. A report counts here when any device it lists carries this brand name after punctuation and capitalisation are normalised. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.
Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.