Reported Reactions

Devices › Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (non-crt)

Device brand name · Implantable lead

Endotak Reliance S: medical device reports filed with FDA

369 reports name it, 2001–2026. Manufacturer given most often on reports: Boston Scientific. Product code LWS.

369
device reports naming the brand
0% of all MAUDE reports · about 15 a year
63
reports, 12 months to August 2026
57 in the 12 months before
37.7%
classified as malfunction
37.4% across the product code
0%
classified as death, as reported
0 reports · not verified by FDA

FDA's MAUDE database holds 369 reports that name the brand "Endotak Reliance S" (implantable lead), received between February 2001 and August 2026; the manufacturer given most often on reports is Boston Scientific. Spellings of one product vary from report to report.

63 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, up 11% from 57 in the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are injury (62.3%) and malfunction (37.7%); across all implantable cardioverter defibrillator (non-crt) reports (product code LWS) death is recorded in 2.7% and malfunction in 37.4%. Event type is the reporter's classification of the report, not a verified outcome.

The device problems coded most often are high impedance (26.3%), high capture threshold (15.4%) and over-sensing (12.2%). The patient problems coded most often are perforation, sepsis and bacterial infection. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Reports by month, five years

01326Sep 2021: 0Oct 2021: 7Nov 2021: 0Dec 2021: 12022Jan 2022: 1Feb 2022: 1Mar 2022: 1Apr 2022: 12May 2022: 6Jun 2022: 4Jul 2022: 3Aug 2022: 0Sep 2022: 5Oct 2022: 5Nov 2022: 4Dec 2022: 62023Jan 2023: 4Feb 2023: 2Mar 2023: 6Apr 2023: 3May 2023: 4Jun 2023: 2Jul 2023: 1Aug 2023: 3Sep 2023: 1Oct 2023: 5Nov 2023: 2Dec 2023: 62024Jan 2024: 5Feb 2024: 3Mar 2024: 6Apr 2024: 6May 2024: 1Jun 2024: 5Jul 2024: 2Aug 2024: 2Sep 2024: 4Oct 2024: 0Nov 2024: 5Dec 2024: 72025Jan 2025: 3Feb 2025: 3Mar 2025: 5Apr 2025: 12May 2025: 6Jun 2025: 4Jul 2025: 3Aug 2025: 5Sep 2025: 4Oct 2025: 5Nov 2025: 0Dec 2025: 32026Jan 2026: 3Feb 2026: 2Mar 2026: 6Apr 2026: 2May 2026: 4Jun 2026: 1Jul 2026: 7Aug 2026: 26

Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases.

By year received

027532001: 1220012002: 32003: 520032004: 72005: 920052006: 52007: 1220072008: 122018: 320182019: 142020: 1920202021: 312022: 4820222023: 392024: 4620242025: 532026: 512026

Event type and report source

Event type, as classified on the report

Death0%0
Injury62.3%230
Malfunction37.7%139
Other0%0
Not given0%0

Who filed the report

Manufacturer report100%369
Voluntary report0%0
User facility report0%0
Distributor report0%0
Not given0%0

Grey bar: all 380,959 reports carrying product code LWS. Event type is the filer's classification and is not verified by FDA.

Device problems coded

Device problem (FDA code)ReportsShareShare across product code
High impedance9726.3%15.6%
High capture threshold5715.4%3.6%
Over-sensing4512.2%21.1%
Signal artifact/noise3910.6%8%
Device dislodged or dislocated287.6%1.8%
Pacing problem246.5%3.8%
Failure to capture205.4%2.6%
Defective devicethe device was defective195.1%1.3%
Low impedance133.5%2.8%
Fracturea broken bone113%5.8%
Impedance problem113%4.4%
Device sensing problem102.7%3.9%
Material integrity problema problem with the device material92.4%0.6%
Dislodged71.9%0.7%
Failure to read input signal71.9%2.1%
Inappropriate/inadequate shock/stimulation71.9%12.8%
Insufficient device problem information71.9%1.7%
Noise71.9%1.3%
Failure to convert rhythm51.4%0.9%
Device damaged prior to usethe device was damaged before use41.1%0.8%

FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report; one report can carry several. Generic codes such as "no apparent adverse event" are left out.

Patient problems coded

Patient problem (FDA code)ReportsShare
Perforation113%
Sepsisa severe body-wide response to infection82.2%
Bacterial infectiona bacterial infection61.6%
Cardiac perforation61.6%
Asystole51.4%
Electric shockan electric shock51.4%
Discomfortdiscomfort41.1%
Cardiac arrestthe heart stopped30.8%
Low blood pressure/ hypotension30.8%
Other (for use when an appropriate patient code cannot be identified)30.8%
Twiddlers syndrome30.8%
Arrhythmia20.5%
Cardiac tamponade20.5%
Chest painchest pain20.5%
Dizzinesslight-headedness or unsteadiness20.5%

Patient problem codes are present mainly in reports filed since 2019 and are often blank.

In context

MeasureEndotak Reliance SProduct code LWSAll MAUDE reports
Reports369380,95926,136,888
Share of that pool—0.1%0%
Classified as death, per 1,000 reports0279
Classified as injury62.3%59.6%36.2%
Classified as malfunction37.7%37.4%62.3%
Filed by the manufacturer100%97.8%94.9%

Shares are of reports, not of devices in use. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Other brands with product code LWS

BrandReportsLatest 12 monthsClassified as death
Sprint Quattro Secure S MRI SureScan36,8956,4361.4%
Emblem Mri S-Icd21,4803,0880.2%
Sprint Quattro Secure24,23725.2%
Emblem S-Icd17,2502,2370.1%
Sprint Fidelis17,00534014.1%
Sprint Quattro Secure S14,39802.4%
Endotak Reliance25,8972381.2%
Sprint Quattro Secure MRI SureScan15,6061,9031.4%
Endotak Reliance G10,1151,0490.6%
Teligen16,537470.6%
Durata Sts Optim Active Fixation9,6813015.6%
Sprint Quattro5,59102.6%
Reliance 4-Front9,8522,0240.4%
Sprint6,1311612.4%
Vitality 24,77901%

Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA also states that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product."

Questions about Endotak Reliance S reports

How many FDA reports name Endotak Reliance S?

369 medical device reports in the openFDA MAUDE release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through August 2026; 63 in the latest 12 months.

What kinds of events are reported?

injury (62.3%) and malfunction (37.7%). "Event type" is how the report was classified when filed: death, injury, malfunction or other.

What device problems are coded?

high impedance (26.3%), high capture threshold (15.4%), over-sensing (12.2%), signal artifact/noise (10.6%) and device dislodged or dislocated (7.6%). These are FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report.

Who files these reports?

manufacturer reports (100%). Manufacturers and user facilities are required to report; voluntary reports come from health professionals and the public.

Do these reports show that Endotak Reliance S was at fault?

No. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA adds that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report."

How do I report a problem with a medical device?

Through FDA MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 for health professionals and consumers), or to the manufacturer. See the guide on how to report.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. A report counts here when any device it lists carries this brand name after punctuation and capitalisation are normalised. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.