Reported Reactions

Devices › Orthosis, spondylolisthesis spinal fixation

Device brand name · Creo threaded locking cap

Creo: medical device reports filed with FDA

427 reports name it, 2016–2026. Manufacturer given most often on reports: Globus Medical. Product code MNH.

427
device reports naming the brand
0% of all MAUDE reports · about 42 a year
48
reports, 12 months to August 2026
47 in the 12 months before
92.5%
classified as malfunction
35% across the product code
0.2%
classified as death, as reported
1 reports · not verified by FDA

427 medical device reports received by FDA name the brand "Creo" (creo threaded locking cap); the manufacturer given most often on reports is Globus Medical; received from June 2016 to August 2026. Brand names are as the reporter or manufacturer wrote them, so one product can appear under several spellings.

48 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, close to the 47 of the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are malfunction (92.5%), injury (7%) and death (0.2%); across all orthosis, spondylolisthesis spinal fixation reports (product code MNH) death is recorded in 0% and malfunction in 35%. Event type is the reporter's classification of the report, not a verified outcome.

The device problems coded most often are loose or intermittent connection (15.7%), migration (14.1%) and fracture (12.2%). The patient problems coded most often are spinal column injury, failure of implant and appropriate clinical signs, symptoms and conditions term/code not available. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Reports by month, five years

054107Sep 2021: 2Oct 2021: 2Nov 2021: 1Dec 2021: 42022Jan 2022: 4Feb 2022: 9Mar 2022: 4Apr 2022: 2May 2022: 0Jun 2022: 2Jul 2022: 3Aug 2022: 5Sep 2022: 3Oct 2022: 5Nov 2022: 1Dec 2022: 02023Jan 2023: 4Feb 2023: 2Mar 2023: 2Apr 2023: 0May 2023: 0Jun 2023: 0Jul 2023: 0Aug 2023: 0Sep 2023: 0Oct 2023: 0Nov 2023: 0Dec 2023: 02024Jan 2024: 4Feb 2024: 26Mar 2024: 107Apr 2024: 7May 2024: 4Jun 2024: 4Jul 2024: 6Aug 2024: 2Sep 2024: 3Oct 2024: 3Nov 2024: 7Dec 2024: 52025Jan 2025: 4Feb 2025: 12Mar 2025: 7Apr 2025: 4May 2025: 0Jun 2025: 0Jul 2025: 0Aug 2025: 2Sep 2025: 3Oct 2025: 4Nov 2025: 1Dec 2025: 52026Jan 2026: 5Feb 2026: 7Mar 2026: 5Apr 2026: 5May 2026: 2Jun 2026: 3Jul 2026: 4Aug 2026: 4

Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases.

By year received

0891782016: 320162020: 4020202021: 8320212022: 3820222023: 820232024: 17820242025: 4220252026: 352026

Event type and report source

Event type, as classified on the report

Death0.2%1
Injury7%30
Malfunction92.5%395
Other0%0
Not given0.2%1

Who filed the report

Manufacturer report99.3%424
Voluntary report0%0
User facility report0%0
Distributor report0%0
Not given0.7%3

Grey bar: all 4,393 reports carrying product code MNH. Event type is the filer's classification and is not verified by FDA.

Device problems coded

Device problem (FDA code)ReportsShareShare across product code
Loose or intermittent connection6715.7%4.2%
Migrationthe device moved from where it was placed6014.1%4.4%
Fracturea broken bone5212.2%5%
Breakthe device broke317.3%21.3%
Insufficient device problem information317.3%6.6%
Human-device interface problem235.4%0.5%
Detachment of device or device componentpart of the device came off204.7%1.9%
Device dislodged or dislocated194.4%3.1%
Device slipped174%6.3%
Loosening of implant not related to bone-ingrowth153.5%1%
Material separation143.3%1.3%
Migration or expulsion of device81.9%3.2%
Device handling problem61.4%0.1%
Material fragmentation51.2%0.3%
Patient device interaction problem40.9%1.1%
Product quality problem40.9%0.2%
Entrapment of device30.7%0.3%
Loss of or failure to bond30.7%0.1%
Material integrity problema problem with the device material30.7%2%
Mechanical problema mechanical problem30.7%2.2%

FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report; one report can carry several. Generic codes such as "no apparent adverse event" are left out.

Patient problems coded

Patient problem (FDA code)ReportsShare
Spinal column injury6014.1%
Failure of implant4410.3%
Appropriate clinical signs, symptoms and conditions term/code not available163.7%
Foreign body in patientpart of a device left in the patient133%
Painpain, site not specified102.3%
Spinal cord injury51.2%
Implant pain30.7%
Bone fracture(s)20.5%
Device embedded in tissue or plaque20.5%
Falla fall20.5%
Adhesion(s)10.2%
Complaint, ill-defined10.2%
Hemorrhage/blood loss/bleeding10.2%
Multiple organ dysfunction syndromeseveral organs failing10.2%
Nonunion/delayed-union bone fracture10.2%

Patient problem codes are present mainly in reports filed since 2019 and are often blank.

In context

MeasureCreoProduct code MNHAll MAUDE reports
Reports4274,39326,136,888
Share of that pool—9.7%0%
Classified as death, per 1,000 reports209
Classified as injury7%64.2%36.2%
Classified as malfunction92.5%35%62.3%
Filed by the manufacturer99.3%99.3%94.9%

Shares are of reports, not of devices in use. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Other brands with product code MNH

BrandReportsLatest 12 monthsClassified as death
Unknown Screw/Rod Construct Accessories29600%
Ti Collar With Grooves28600%
Ti Nut 11mm Width Across Flats32800%
Xia 3 Titanium Blocker34070%
Unknown Screws652231.7%
Unknown Mono/Polyaxial Screws39000%
Ti Locking Screw42200%
Unknown Rods18391.1%
Verse Correction Key28830%
Mis Single Inner Setscw20990.5%
Unknown Cage/Spacer28040%
Unknown_Spine_Product596240%
Ti Matrix Locking Cap48901.2%
Cd Horizon Solera 5 5/6 04781310%
UNK - Constructs: Plate/Screws85090%

Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA also states that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product."

Questions about Creo reports

How many FDA reports name Creo?

427 medical device reports in the openFDA MAUDE release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through August 2026; 48 in the latest 12 months.

What kinds of events are reported?

malfunction (92.5%), injury (7%) and death (0.2%). "Event type" is how the report was classified when filed: death, injury, malfunction or other.

What device problems are coded?

loose or intermittent connection (15.7%), migration (14.1%), fracture (12.2%), break (7.3%) and insufficient device problem information (7.3%). These are FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report.

Who files these reports?

manufacturer reports (99.3%). Manufacturers and user facilities are required to report; voluntary reports come from health professionals and the public.

Do these reports show that Creo was at fault?

No. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA adds that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report."

How do I report a problem with a medical device?

Through FDA MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 for health professionals and consumers), or to the manufacturer. See the guide on how to report.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. A report counts here when any device it lists carries this brand name after punctuation and capitalisation are normalised. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.