Reported Reactions

Devices › Respiratory virus panel nucleic acid assay system

Device brand name · Respiratory virus panel nucleic acid assay system

Cobas Liat System: medical device reports filed with FDA

690 reports name it, 2020–2021. Manufacturer given most often on reports: Roche Molecular Systems - Branchburg. Product code OCC.

690
device reports naming the brand
0% of all MAUDE reports · about 124 a year
0
reports, 12 months to August 2026
0 in the 12 months before
99.9%
classified as malfunction
98.4% across the product code
0.1%
classified as death, as reported
1 reports · not verified by FDA

690 medical device reports received by FDA name the brand "Cobas Liat System" (respiratory virus panel nucleic acid assay system); the manufacturer given most often on reports is Roche Molecular Systems - Branchburg; received from December 2020 to June 2021. Brand names are as the reporter or manufacturer wrote them, so one product can appear under several spellings.

0 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, and none in the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are malfunction (99.9%) and death (0.1%); across all respiratory virus panel nucleic acid assay system reports (product code OCC) death is recorded in 1.1% and malfunction in 98.4%. Event type is the reporter's classification of the report, not a verified outcome.

The device problems coded most often are false positive result (98.3%), incorrect, inadequate or imprecise result or readings (42.5%) and output problem (38.7%). The patient problems coded most often are anxiety, respiratory tract infection and bronchopneumonia. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Reports by month, five years

No report naming Cobas Liat System was received in the five years to August 2026; the latest was received in June 2021.

Event type and report source

Event type, as classified on the report

Death0.1%1
Injury0%0
Malfunction99.9%689
Other0%0
Not given0%0

Who filed the report

Manufacturer report100%690
Voluntary report0%0
User facility report0%0
Distributor report0%0
Not given0%0

Grey bar: all 808 reports carrying product code OCC. Event type is the filer's classification and is not verified by FDA.

Device problems coded

Device problem (FDA code)ReportsShareShare across product code
False positive result67898.3%93.4%
Incorrect, inadequate or imprecise result or readings29342.5%36.8%
Output problem26738.7%33.3%
Unable to obtain readings101.4%1.4%
Non reproducible results40.6%0.9%
Optical obstruction10.1%0.1%

FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report; one report can carry several. Generic codes such as "no apparent adverse event" are left out.

Patient problems coded

Patient problem (FDA code)ReportsShare
Anxietyanxiety63692.2%
Respiratory tract infectiona respiratory infection131.9%
Bronchopneumonia10.1%
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)10.1%
Test result10.1%

Patient problem codes are present mainly in reports filed since 2019 and are often blank.

In context

MeasureCobas Liat SystemProduct code OCCAll MAUDE reports
Reports69080826,136,888
Share of that pool—85.4%0%
Classified as death, per 1,000 reports1119
Classified as injury0%0.5%36.2%
Classified as malfunction99.9%98.4%62.3%
Filed by the manufacturer100%99.3%94.9%

Shares are of reports, not of devices in use. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Other brands with product code OCC

BrandReportsLatest 12 monthsClassified as death
Cobas Sars-Cov-2 & Influenza A/B Test For Use On The Cobas Liat System2,02600%
Cobas Sars-Cov-2 & Influenza A/B1,01600%

Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA also states that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product."

Questions about Cobas Liat System reports

How many FDA reports name Cobas Liat System?

690 medical device reports in the openFDA MAUDE release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through August 2026; 0 in the latest 12 months.

What kinds of events are reported?

malfunction (99.9%) and death (0.1%). "Event type" is how the report was classified when filed: death, injury, malfunction or other.

What device problems are coded?

false positive result (98.3%), incorrect, inadequate or imprecise result or readings (42.5%), output problem (38.7%), unable to obtain readings (1.4%) and non reproducible results (0.6%). These are FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report.

Who files these reports?

manufacturer reports (100%). Manufacturers and user facilities are required to report; voluntary reports come from health professionals and the public.

Do these reports show that Cobas Liat System was at fault?

No. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA adds that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report."

How do I report a problem with a medical device?

Through FDA MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 for health professionals and consumers), or to the manufacturer. See the guide on how to report.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. A report counts here when any device it lists carries this brand name after punctuation and capitalisation are normalised. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.