Reported Reactions

Devices › Lens, intraocular, toric optics

Device brand name · Lens intraocular toric optics

CLAREON PANOPTIX PRO Trifocal TORIC UV Absorbing IOL w/AutonoME Delivery System: medical device reports filed with FDA

150 reports name it, 2025–2026. Manufacturer given most often on reports: Alcon Laboratories Ireland. Product code MJP.

150
device reports naming the brand
0% of all MAUDE reports · about 139 a year
146
reports, 12 months to August 2026
4 in the 12 months before
42.7%
classified as malfunction
42% across the product code
0%
classified as death, as reported
0 reports · not verified by FDA

FDA's MAUDE database holds 150 reports that name the brand "CLAREON PANOPTIX PRO Trifocal TORIC UV Absorbing IOL w/AutonoME Delivery System" (lens intraocular toric optics), received between June 2025 and August 2026; the manufacturer given most often on reports is Alcon Laboratories Ireland. Spellings of one product vary from report to report.

146 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, up 3550% from 4 in the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are injury (57.3%) and malfunction (42.7%); across all lens, intraocular, toric optics reports (product code MJP) death is recorded in 0% and malfunction in 42%. Event type is the reporter's classification of the report, not a verified outcome.

The device problems coded most often are device difficult to setup or prepare (10%), failure to deliver (8%) and failure to advance (4.7%). The patient problems coded most often are blurred vision, visual disturbances and visual impairment. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Reports by month, five years

01020Sep 2021: 0Oct 2021: 0Nov 2021: 0Dec 2021: 02022Jan 2022: 0Feb 2022: 0Mar 2022: 0Apr 2022: 0May 2022: 0Jun 2022: 0Jul 2022: 0Aug 2022: 0Sep 2022: 0Oct 2022: 0Nov 2022: 0Dec 2022: 02023Jan 2023: 0Feb 2023: 0Mar 2023: 0Apr 2023: 0May 2023: 0Jun 2023: 0Jul 2023: 0Aug 2023: 0Sep 2023: 0Oct 2023: 0Nov 2023: 0Dec 2023: 02024Jan 2024: 0Feb 2024: 0Mar 2024: 0Apr 2024: 0May 2024: 0Jun 2024: 0Jul 2024: 0Aug 2024: 0Sep 2024: 0Oct 2024: 0Nov 2024: 0Dec 2024: 02025Jan 2025: 0Feb 2025: 0Mar 2025: 0Apr 2025: 0May 2025: 0Jun 2025: 1Jul 2025: 1Aug 2025: 2Sep 2025: 9Oct 2025: 7Nov 2025: 9Dec 2025: 162026Jan 2026: 8Feb 2026: 20Mar 2026: 9Apr 2026: 15May 2026: 15Jun 2026: 15Jul 2026: 15Aug 2026: 8

Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases.

Event type and report source

Event type, as classified on the report

Death0%0
Injury57.3%86
Malfunction42.7%64
Other0%0
Not given0%0

Who filed the report

Manufacturer report100%150
Voluntary report0%0
User facility report0%0
Distributor report0%0
Not given0%0

Grey bar: all 8,214 reports carrying product code MJP. Event type is the filer's classification and is not verified by FDA.

Device problems coded

Device problem (FDA code)ReportsShareShare across product code
Device difficult to setup or prepare1510%2.8%
Failure to deliverthe device did not deliver the dose or item128%2.5%
Failure to advance74.7%1.5%
Inaccurate delivery74.7%0.9%
Device damaged by another device64%1%
Failure to fold64%0.6%
Scratched material53.3%7.8%
Material deformation32%0.9%
Failure to unfold or unwrap21.3%0.6%
Material twisted/bent21.3%2%
Product quality problem21.3%1.3%
Activation problem10.7%0.1%
Breakthe device broke10.7%8.8%
Dent in material10.7%0.1%
Device dislodged or dislocated10.7%5.9%
Failure to prime10.7%0.1%
Inaccurate information10.7%0%

FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report; one report can carry several. Generic codes such as "no apparent adverse event" are left out.

Patient problems coded

Patient problem (FDA code)ReportsShare
Blurred vision4630.7%
Visual disturbances3724.7%
Visual impairmentreduced vision2516.7%
Dry eye(s)32%
Diplopia/double vision21.3%
Headachehead pain21.3%
Appropriate clinical signs, symptoms and conditions term/code not available10.7%
Capsular bag tear10.7%
Corneal scar10.7%
Eye injury10.7%
Halo10.7%
Posterior capsule opacification10.7%
Vitreous floatersfloaters in vision10.7%
Zonular dehiscence10.7%

Patient problem codes are present mainly in reports filed since 2019 and are often blank.

In context

MeasureCLAREON PANOPTIX PRO Trifocal TORIC UV Absorbing IOL w/AutonoME Delivery SystemProduct code MJPAll MAUDE reports
Reports1508,21426,136,888
Share of that pool—1.8%0%
Classified as death, per 1,000 reports009
Classified as injury57.3%54.5%36.2%
Classified as malfunction42.7%42%62.3%
Filed by the manufacturer100%99.8%94.9%

Shares are of reports, not of devices in use. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Other brands with product code MJP

BrandReportsLatest 12 monthsClassified as death
AcrySof IQ Toric Singlepiece IOL1,767600%
Tecnis Iol5,9017150%
Clareon Toric Aspheric Hydrophobic Acrylic IOL with AutonoME Delivery System5672350%
Clareon Toric IOL5672070%
Clareon PanOptix Toric Trifocal UV Absorbing IOL488750%
Clareon PanOptix Toric Trifocal Hydrophobic IOL4301360%
Clareon Vivity Toric Extended Vision UV Absorbing IOL388950%
Clareon Vivity Toric Extended Vision Hydrophobic IOL3141190%
Clareon Toric UV Absorbing IOL3091260%
Acrysof Restor Toric Singlepiece Iol26900%
Acrysof Iq Toric1,90500%
Acrysof Toric63800%
Trulign Toric Posterior Chamber Iol17900%
Tecnis3,08200.1%
Tecnis Symfony Toric1,09600%

Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA also states that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product."

Questions about CLAREON PANOPTIX PRO Trifocal TORIC UV Absorbing IOL w/AutonoME Delivery System reports

How many FDA reports name CLAREON PANOPTIX PRO Trifocal TORIC UV Absorbing IOL w/AutonoME Delivery System?

150 medical device reports in the openFDA MAUDE release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through August 2026; 146 in the latest 12 months.

What kinds of events are reported?

injury (57.3%) and malfunction (42.7%). "Event type" is how the report was classified when filed: death, injury, malfunction or other.

What device problems are coded?

device difficult to setup or prepare (10%), failure to deliver (8%), failure to advance (4.7%), inaccurate delivery (4.7%) and device damaged by another device (4%). These are FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report.

Who files these reports?

manufacturer reports (100%). Manufacturers and user facilities are required to report; voluntary reports come from health professionals and the public.

Do these reports show that CLAREON PANOPTIX PRO Trifocal TORIC UV Absorbing IOL w/AutonoME Delivery System was at fault?

No. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA adds that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report."

How do I report a problem with a medical device?

Through FDA MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 for health professionals and consumers), or to the manufacturer. See the guide on how to report.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. A report counts here when any device it lists carries this brand name after punctuation and capitalisation are normalised. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.