Device brand name · Stent carotid
Carotid WALLSTENT: medical device reports filed with FDA
840 reports name it, 2006–2026. Manufacturer given most often on reports: Boston Scientific. Product code NIM.
- 840
- device reports naming the brand
- 0% of all MAUDE reports · about 41 a year
- 122
- reports, 12 months to August 2026
- 242 in the 12 months before
- 78.1%
- classified as malfunction
- 26.7% across the product code
- 0.8%
- classified as death, as reported
- 7 reports · not verified by FDA
840 medical device reports received by FDA name the brand "Carotid WALLSTENT" (stent carotid); the manufacturer given most often on reports is Boston Scientific; received from January 2006 to August 2026. Brand names are as the reporter or manufacturer wrote them, so one product can appear under several spellings.
122 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, down 50% from 242 in the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are malfunction (78.1%), injury (21.1%) and death (0.8%); across all stent, carotid reports (product code NIM) death is recorded in 8% and malfunction in 26.7%. Event type is the reporter's classification of the report, not a verified outcome.
The device problems coded most often are difficult to remove (17.4%), entrapment of device (14.6%) and activation, positioning or separation problem (14.2%). The patient problems coded most often are no patient involvement, ischemia stroke and stroke/cva. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."
Reports by month, five years
Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases.
By year received
Event type and report source
Event type, as classified on the report
Who filed the report
Grey bar: all 8,728 reports carrying product code NIM. Event type is the filer's classification and is not verified by FDA.
Device problems coded
| Device problem (FDA code) | Reports | Share | Share across product code |
|---|---|---|---|
| Difficult to removethe device was hard to remove | 146 | 17.4% | 4.2% |
| Entrapment of device | 123 | 14.6% | 1.5% |
| Activation, positioning or separation problem | 119 | 14.2% | 3.8% |
| Material deformation | 73 | 8.7% | 1.9% |
| Positioning failure | 68 | 8.1% | 2.3% |
| Difficult to advance | 60 | 7.1% | 1.2% |
| Activation failure | 58 | 6.9% | 2.5% |
| Premature activation | 55 | 6.5% | 2.9% |
| Breakthe device broke | 51 | 6.1% | 3.3% |
| Mechanical problema mechanical problem | 47 | 5.6% | 0.5% |
| Difficult or delayed positioning | 44 | 5.2% | 3.8% |
| Failure to advance | 35 | 4.2% | 1.2% |
| Bent | 32 | 3.8% | 0.5% |
| Positioning problem | 25 | 3% | 0.6% |
| Defective devicethe device was defective | 20 | 2.4% | 0.3% |
| Device damaged prior to usethe device was damaged before use | 19 | 2.3% | 0.6% |
| Device-device incompatibility | 16 | 1.9% | 0.2% |
| Migrationthe device moved from where it was placed | 16 | 1.9% | 0.3% |
| Material integrity problema problem with the device material | 15 | 1.8% | 0.2% |
| Device dislodged or dislocated | 14 | 1.7% | 0.4% |
FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report; one report can carry several. Generic codes such as "no apparent adverse event" are left out.
Patient problems coded
| Patient problem (FDA code) | Reports | Share |
|---|---|---|
| No patient involvement | 48 | 5.7% |
| Ischemia stroke | 11 | 1.3% |
| Stroke/cva | 11 | 1.3% |
| Restenosis | 9 | 1.1% |
| Device embedded in tissue or plaque | 8 | 1% |
| Transient ischemic attack | 8 | 1% |
| Obstruction/occlusion | 7 | 0.8% |
| Reocclusion | 7 | 0.8% |
| Vascular dissection | 7 | 0.8% |
| Vasoconstriction | 7 | 0.8% |
| Foreign body in patientpart of a device left in the patient | 5 | 0.6% |
| Infarction, cerebral | 5 | 0.6% |
| Thrombosis | 5 | 0.6% |
| Hemorrhage/blood loss/bleeding | 4 | 0.5% |
| Myocardial infarctionheart attack | 4 | 0.5% |
Patient problem codes are present mainly in reports filed since 2019 and are often blank.
In context
| Measure | Carotid WALLSTENT | Product code NIM | All MAUDE reports |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reports | 840 | 8,728 | 26,136,888 |
| Share of that pool | — | 9.6% | 0% |
| Classified as death, per 1,000 reports | 8 | 80 | 9 |
| Classified as injury | 21.1% | 64.8% | 36.2% |
| Classified as malfunction | 78.1% | 26.7% | 62.3% |
| Filed by the manufacturer | 100% | 98.2% | 94.9% |
Shares are of reports, not of devices in use. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."
Other brands with product code NIM
| Brand | Reports | Latest 12 months | Classified as death |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rx Acculink Carotid Stent System | 2,016 | 0 | 9.3% |
| Precise Pro Rx Carotid Stent System | 1,331 | 0 | 15.9% |
| Xact Carotid Stent System | 1,292 | 0 | 9.5% |
| Carotid Wallstent Monorail | 459 | 0 | 1.7% |
| Protege Rx Carotid Stent System | 442 | 54 | 6.3% |
| Precise Otw Nitinol Stent | 330 | 0 | 2.4% |
| Enroute Transcarotid Stent System | 218 | 0 | 2.8% |
| Precise Rx Nitinol Stent | 300 | 0 | 17.7% |
| CGuard Prime Carotid Stent System | 187 | 187 | 1.1% |
| Nexstent Monorail | 187 | 0 | 2.7% |
| Rx Accunet Embolic Protection System | 429 | 0 | 2.1% |
| GORE EXCLUDER AAA Endoprosthesis | 9,590 | 633 | 4.8% |
| Multi-Link Rx Vision Coronary Stent System | 1,875 | 0 | 4.2% |
| Protege Gps Self-Expanding Stent System 035 Standard | 178 | 9 | 2.8% |
| Angioguard Rx Emboli Capture Guidewire System | 317 | 0 | 0.6% |
Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA also states that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product."
Questions about Carotid WALLSTENT reports
How many FDA reports name Carotid WALLSTENT?
840 medical device reports in the openFDA MAUDE release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through August 2026; 122 in the latest 12 months.
What kinds of events are reported?
malfunction (78.1%), injury (21.1%) and death (0.8%). "Event type" is how the report was classified when filed: death, injury, malfunction or other.
What device problems are coded?
difficult to remove (17.4%), entrapment of device (14.6%), activation, positioning or separation problem (14.2%), material deformation (8.7%) and positioning failure (8.1%). These are FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report.
Who files these reports?
manufacturer reports (100%). Manufacturers and user facilities are required to report; voluntary reports come from health professionals and the public.
Do these reports show that Carotid WALLSTENT was at fault?
No. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA adds that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report."
How do I report a problem with a medical device?
Through FDA MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 for health professionals and consumers), or to the manufacturer. See the guide on how to report.
Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. A report counts here when any device it lists carries this brand name after punctuation and capitalisation are normalised. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.
Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.