Reported Reactions

Devices › Stimulator, spinal-cord, totally implanted for pain relief

Device brand name · Stimulator spinal-cord totally implanted for pain relief

Artisan?: medical device reports filed with FDA

934 reports name it, 2008–2026. Manufacturer given most often on reports: Boston Scientific Neuromodulation. Product code LGW.

934
device reports naming the brand
0% of all MAUDE reports · about 51 a year
127
reports, 12 months to August 2026
117 in the 12 months before
13%
classified as malfunction
27.3% across the product code
0.6%
classified as death, as reported
6 reports · not verified by FDA

FDA's MAUDE database holds 934 reports that name the brand "Artisan?" (stimulator spinal-cord totally implanted for pain relief), received between March 2008 and August 2026; the manufacturer given most often on reports is Boston Scientific Neuromodulation. Spellings of one product vary from report to report.

127 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, close to the 117 of the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are injury (86.4%), malfunction (13%) and death (0.6%); across all stimulator, spinal-cord, totally implanted for pain relief reports (product code LGW) death is recorded in 0.5% and malfunction in 27.3%. Event type is the reporter's classification of the report, not a verified outcome.

The device problems coded most often are unexpected therapeutic results (37.2%), migration (29.8%) and high impedance (26.4%). The patient problems coded most often are pain, inadequate pain relief and undesired nerve stimulation. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Reports by month, five years

01020Sep 2021: 4Oct 2021: 5Nov 2021: 10Dec 2021: 72022Jan 2022: 6Feb 2022: 11Mar 2022: 8Apr 2022: 5May 2022: 11Jun 2022: 9Jul 2022: 6Aug 2022: 11Sep 2022: 12Oct 2022: 7Nov 2022: 9Dec 2022: 102023Jan 2023: 2Feb 2023: 6Mar 2023: 9Apr 2023: 14May 2023: 5Jun 2023: 7Jul 2023: 5Aug 2023: 6Sep 2023: 12Oct 2023: 6Nov 2023: 9Dec 2023: 132024Jan 2024: 10Feb 2024: 12Mar 2024: 12Apr 2024: 7May 2024: 12Jun 2024: 8Jul 2024: 12Aug 2024: 6Sep 2024: 11Oct 2024: 14Nov 2024: 12Dec 2024: 82025Jan 2025: 11Feb 2025: 5Mar 2025: 11Apr 2025: 4May 2025: 7Jun 2025: 13Jul 2025: 12Aug 2025: 9Sep 2025: 7Oct 2025: 9Nov 2025: 8Dec 2025: 152026Jan 2026: 7Feb 2026: 12Mar 2026: 6Apr 2026: 9May 2026: 20Jun 2026: 8Jul 2026: 12Aug 2026: 14

Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases.

By year received

0651302008: 1120082011: 62012: 320122018: 552019: 13020192020: 1122021: 9520212022: 1052023: 9420232024: 1242025: 11120252026: 88

Event type and report source

Event type, as classified on the report

Death0.6%6
Injury86.4%807
Malfunction13%121
Other0%0
Not given0%0

Who filed the report

Manufacturer report100%934
Voluntary report0%0
User facility report0%0
Distributor report0%0
Not given0%0

Grey bar: all 378,355 reports carrying product code LGW. Event type is the filer's classification and is not verified by FDA.

Device problems coded

Device problem (FDA code)ReportsShareShare across product code
Unexpected therapeutic results34737.2%4.3%
Migrationthe device moved from where it was placed27829.8%5.7%
High impedance24726.4%9.7%
Fracturea broken bone10811.6%1.8%
Device dislodged or dislocated454.8%0.2%
Inappropriate/inadequate shock/stimulation202.1%3.7%
Defective devicethe device was defective131.4%0.6%
Charging problem101.1%11.2%
Difficult to insertthe device was hard to insert80.9%0.1%
Failure to disconnect70.7%0%
Intermittent energy output40.4%0.1%
Positioning problem40.4%1.5%
Difficult to removethe device was hard to remove30.3%0.1%
Insufficient device problem information30.3%6.8%
Material twisted/bent30.3%0.1%
Off-label use30.3%0%
Unintended movement30.3%0.2%
Nonstandard device20.2%0.2%
Structural problem20.2%0%
Wireless communication problema wireless connection problem20.2%3.4%

FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report; one report can carry several. Generic codes such as "no apparent adverse event" are left out.

Patient problems coded

Patient problem (FDA code)ReportsShare
Painpain, site not specified17819.1%
Inadequate pain relief10010.7%
Undesired nerve stimulation414.4%
Paralysis374%
Bacterial infectiona bacterial infection313.3%
Discomfortdiscomfort262.8%
Hematomaa collection of blood under the skin or in tissue202.1%
Numbnessnumbness161.7%
Fluid discharge121.3%
Abdominal painstomach or belly pain111.2%
Erosion91%
Muscle weakness/atrophy70.7%
Cerebrospinal fluid leakage60.6%
Falla fall60.6%
Implant pain50.5%

Patient problem codes are present mainly in reports filed since 2019 and are often blank.

In context

MeasureArtisan?Product code LGWAll MAUDE reports
Reports934378,35526,136,888
Share of that pool—0.2%0%
Classified as death, per 1,000 reports659
Classified as injury86.4%72%36.2%
Classified as malfunction13%27.3%62.3%
Filed by the manufacturer100%99.5%94.9%

Shares are of reports, not of devices in use. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Other brands with product code LGW

BrandReportsLatest 12 monthsClassified as death
Intellis42,0324,7430%
Octrode Lead Kit, 60cm Length47,0375,1330.1%
SureScan33,1234900%
Precision?26,0204460.4%
Proclaim 5 Elite Implantable Pulse Generator20,8162,0570.1%
Precision Spectra ?16,8589710.5%
Restore Ultra13,500390.1%
Eon Mini IPG, 16-Channel Rechargeable14,1761110.2%
Restore Sensor10,934400.1%
Spectra WaveWriter?7,7661,0930.4%
Penta 3mm Lead, 60 cm9,6178390.3%
Senza6,42371815.1%
Eon Mini9,12200.6%
Proclaim 7 Elite Implantable Pulse Generator5,8363330.1%
WaveWriter Alpha?4,9651,5910.9%

Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA also states that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product."

Questions about Artisan? reports

How many FDA reports name Artisan??

934 medical device reports in the openFDA MAUDE release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through August 2026; 127 in the latest 12 months.

What kinds of events are reported?

injury (86.4%), malfunction (13%) and death (0.6%). "Event type" is how the report was classified when filed: death, injury, malfunction or other.

What device problems are coded?

unexpected therapeutic results (37.2%), migration (29.8%), high impedance (26.4%), fracture (11.6%) and device dislodged or dislocated (4.8%). These are FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report.

Who files these reports?

manufacturer reports (100%). Manufacturers and user facilities are required to report; voluntary reports come from health professionals and the public.

Do these reports show that Artisan? was at fault?

No. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA adds that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report."

How do I report a problem with a medical device?

Through FDA MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 for health professionals and consumers), or to the manufacturer. See the guide on how to report.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. A report counts here when any device it lists carries this brand name after punctuation and capitalisation are normalised. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.