Reported Reactions

Devices › Transcatheter septal occluder

Device brand name · Transcatheter septal occluder

Amplatzer PFO Occluder: medical device reports filed with FDA

598 reports name it, 2005–2026. Manufacturer given most often on reports: Abbott Medical. Product code MLV.

598
device reports naming the brand
0% of all MAUDE reports · about 29 a year
42
reports, 12 months to August 2026
69 in the 12 months before
45.7%
classified as malfunction
37.8% across the product code
2.8%
classified as death, as reported
17 reports · not verified by FDA

FDA's MAUDE database holds 598 reports that name the brand "Amplatzer PFO Occluder" (transcatheter septal occluder), received between August 2005 and August 2026; the manufacturer given most often on reports is Abbott Medical. Spellings of one product vary from report to report.

42 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, down 39% from 69 in the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are injury (51.5%), malfunction (45.7%) and death (2.8%); across all transcatheter septal occluder reports (product code MLV) death is recorded in 2.8% and malfunction in 37.8%. Event type is the reporter's classification of the report, not a verified outcome.

The device problems coded most often are material deformation (25.4%), difficult to fold, unfold or collapse (22.4%) and patient device interaction problem (11.2%). The patient problems coded most often are atrial fibrillation, stroke/cva and transient ischemic attack. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Reports by month, five years

0714Sep 2021: 5Oct 2021: 9Nov 2021: 9Dec 2021: 92022Jan 2022: 4Feb 2022: 6Mar 2022: 4Apr 2022: 9May 2022: 8Jun 2022: 6Jul 2022: 9Aug 2022: 7Sep 2022: 7Oct 2022: 4Nov 2022: 9Dec 2022: 32023Jan 2023: 13Feb 2023: 7Mar 2023: 9Apr 2023: 10May 2023: 5Jun 2023: 9Jul 2023: 2Aug 2023: 2Sep 2023: 8Oct 2023: 5Nov 2023: 5Dec 2023: 42024Jan 2024: 5Feb 2024: 2Mar 2024: 5Apr 2024: 4May 2024: 4Jun 2024: 8Jul 2024: 13Aug 2024: 8Sep 2024: 14Oct 2024: 11Nov 2024: 6Dec 2024: 72025Jan 2025: 3Feb 2025: 1Mar 2025: 1Apr 2025: 5May 2025: 1Jun 2025: 2Jul 2025: 13Aug 2025: 5Sep 2025: 5Oct 2025: 4Nov 2025: 1Dec 2025: 12026Jan 2026: 3Feb 2026: 9Mar 2026: 5Apr 2026: 1May 2026: 4Jun 2026: 7Jul 2026: 0Aug 2026: 2

Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases.

By year received

046912005: 420052017: 142018: 3620182019: 722020: 6620202021: 912022: 7620222023: 792024: 8720242025: 422026: 312026

Event type and report source

Event type, as classified on the report

Death2.8%17
Injury51.5%308
Malfunction45.7%273
Other0%0
Not given0%0

Who filed the report

Manufacturer report99.8%597
Voluntary report0.2%1
User facility report0%0
Distributor report0%0
Not given0%0

Grey bar: all 6,948 reports carrying product code MLV. Event type is the filer's classification and is not verified by FDA.

Device problems coded

Device problem (FDA code)ReportsShareShare across product code
Material deformation15225.4%11.8%
Difficult to fold, unfold or collapse13422.4%26.5%
Patient device interaction problem6711.2%5%
Migration or expulsion of device437.2%14.5%
Biocompatibility274.5%1.4%
Human-device interface problem152.5%0.6%
Patient-device incompatibilitythe device did not suit the patient142.3%2.8%
Unintended movement142.3%2.3%
Off-label use111.8%2.4%
Improper or incorrect procedure or method91.5%1.4%
Material protrusion/extrusion61%0.4%
Inadequacy of device shape and/or size40.7%2.3%
Insufficient device problem information40.7%3.8%
Leak/splashthe device leaked40.7%0.5%
Migrationthe device moved from where it was placed40.7%1.8%
Activation failure20.3%0.2%
Failure to disconnect20.3%0%
Obstruction of flow20.3%0.1%
Backflow10.2%0%
Compatibility problem10.2%0%

FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report; one report can carry several. Generic codes such as "no apparent adverse event" are left out.

Patient problems coded

Patient problem (FDA code)ReportsShare
Atrial fibrillationan irregular heart rhythm579.5%
Stroke/cva518.5%
Transient ischemic attack345.7%
Hemorrhage/blood loss/bleeding274.5%
Pericardial effusionfluid around the heart264.3%
Arrhythmia203.3%
Thrombosis/thrombus193.2%
Chest painchest pain101.7%
Erosion101.7%
Headachehead pain101.7%
Cardiac tamponade91.5%
Hypersensitivity/allergic reaction91.5%
Tachycardiafast heart rate91.5%
Air embolism81.3%
Embolism/embolus81.3%

Patient problem codes are present mainly in reports filed since 2019 and are often blank.

In context

MeasureAmplatzer PFO OccluderProduct code MLVAll MAUDE reports
Reports5986,94826,136,888
Share of that pool—8.6%0%
Classified as death, per 1,000 reports28289
Classified as injury51.5%58.1%36.2%
Classified as malfunction45.7%37.8%62.3%
Filed by the manufacturer99.8%97.4%94.9%

Shares are of reports, not of devices in use. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Other brands with product code MLV

BrandReportsLatest 12 monthsClassified as death
Amplatzer Septal Occluder3,4954062.4%
GORE CARDIOFORM Septal Occluder535801.3%
Amplatzer Talisman PFO Occluder4261250.9%
Gore Helex Septal Occluder27900.4%
Amplatzer Cribriform Occluder27900.4%
GORE CARDIOFORM ASD Occluder274570.7%
Amplatzer Multi-Fenestrated Septal Occluder - Cribriform255630.4%
Amplatzer Muscular VSD Occluder242449.1%
Amplatzer Duct Occluder513832.1%
Amplatzer Torqvue Delivery System208297.2%
GORE DrySeal Flex Introducer Sheath1,1772835.3%

Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA also states that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product."

Questions about Amplatzer PFO Occluder reports

How many FDA reports name Amplatzer PFO Occluder?

598 medical device reports in the openFDA MAUDE release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through August 2026; 42 in the latest 12 months.

What kinds of events are reported?

injury (51.5%), malfunction (45.7%) and death (2.8%). "Event type" is how the report was classified when filed: death, injury, malfunction or other.

What device problems are coded?

material deformation (25.4%), difficult to fold, unfold or collapse (22.4%), patient device interaction problem (11.2%), migration or expulsion of device (7.2%) and biocompatibility (4.5%). These are FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report.

Who files these reports?

manufacturer reports (99.8%) and voluntary reports (0.2%). Manufacturers and user facilities are required to report; voluntary reports come from health professionals and the public.

Do these reports show that Amplatzer PFO Occluder was at fault?

No. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA adds that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report."

How do I report a problem with a medical device?

Through FDA MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 for health professionals and consumers), or to the manufacturer. See the guide on how to report.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. A report counts here when any device it lists carries this brand name after punctuation and capitalisation are normalised. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.