Reported Reactions

Devices › Stent, coronary

Device brand name · Coronary stent system

Acs Rx Multi-Link Coronary Stent System: medical device reports filed with FDA

327 reports name it, 1997–2026. Manufacturer given most often on reports: Guidant Acs/Dvi. Product code MAF.

327
device reports naming the brand
0% of all MAUDE reports · about 11 a year
6
reports, 12 months to August 2026
0 in the 12 months before
24.8%
classified as malfunction
40.4% across the product code
6.1%
classified as death, as reported
20 reports · not verified by FDA

FDA's MAUDE database holds 327 reports that name the brand "Acs Rx Multi-Link Coronary Stent System" (coronary stent system), received between November 1997 and July 2026; the manufacturer given most often on reports is Guidant Acs/Dvi. Spellings of one product vary from report to report.

6 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, with none in the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are injury (68.8%), malfunction (24.8%) and death (6.1%); across all stent, coronary reports (product code MAF) death is recorded in 7.6% and malfunction in 40.4%. Event type is the reporter's classification of the report, not a verified outcome.

The device problems coded most often are dislodged (33.9%), difficult to insert (19.6%) and difficult to remove (17.7%). The patient problems coded most often are surgical procedure, foreign body, removal of and therapy/non-surgical treatment, additional. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Reports by month, five years

035Sep 2021: 0Oct 2021: 0Nov 2021: 0Dec 2021: 02022Jan 2022: 0Feb 2022: 0Mar 2022: 0Apr 2022: 0May 2022: 0Jun 2022: 0Jul 2022: 0Aug 2022: 0Sep 2022: 0Oct 2022: 0Nov 2022: 0Dec 2022: 02023Jan 2023: 0Feb 2023: 0Mar 2023: 0Apr 2023: 0May 2023: 0Jun 2023: 0Jul 2023: 0Aug 2023: 0Sep 2023: 0Oct 2023: 0Nov 2023: 0Dec 2023: 02024Jan 2024: 0Feb 2024: 0Mar 2024: 0Apr 2024: 0May 2024: 0Jun 2024: 0Jul 2024: 0Aug 2024: 0Sep 2024: 0Oct 2024: 0Nov 2024: 0Dec 2024: 02025Jan 2025: 0Feb 2025: 0Mar 2025: 0Apr 2025: 0May 2025: 0Jun 2025: 0Jul 2025: 0Aug 2025: 0Sep 2025: 0Oct 2025: 0Nov 2025: 0Dec 2025: 02026Jan 2026: 5Feb 2026: 0Mar 2026: 0Apr 2026: 0May 2026: 0Jun 2026: 0Jul 2026: 1Aug 2026: 0

Reports by the month FDA received them. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases.

By year received

0871741997: 5119971998: 17419981999: 3819992000: 4220002001: 1620012026: 62026

Event type and report source

Event type, as classified on the report

Death6.1%20
Injury68.8%225
Malfunction24.8%81
Other0.3%1
Not given0%0

Who filed the report

Manufacturer report98.8%323
Voluntary report0%0
User facility report0%0
Distributor report0%0
Not given1.2%4

Grey bar: all 23,279 reports carrying product code MAF. Event type is the filer's classification and is not verified by FDA.

Device problems coded

Device problem (FDA code)ReportsShareShare across product code
Dislodged11133.9%15.9%
Difficult to insertthe device was hard to insert6419.6%6.7%
Difficult to removethe device was hard to remove5817.7%10.2%
Replace5015.3%7.5%
Material separation4915%3.5%
Deflation problem3911.9%2.2%
Inflation problem3410.4%2.5%
Balloon rupture319.5%4.3%
Source, detachment from257.6%1.5%
Device, or device fragments remain in patient247.3%3.4%
Failure to advance226.7%20.9%
Membrane tear(s)226.7%0.1%
Difficult or delayed positioning216.4%3%
Physical resistance216.4%2%
Difficult to position185.5%2.4%
Other (for use when an appropriate device code cannot be identified)144.3%3.7%
Device remains implanted134%6.3%
Positioning failure134%2.8%
Displacement92.8%0.3%
Premature activation92.8%0.8%

FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report; one report can carry several. Generic codes such as "no apparent adverse event" are left out.

Patient problems coded

Patient problem (FDA code)ReportsShare
Surgical procedure6219%
Foreign body, removal of5918%
Therapy/non-surgical treatment, additional4212.8%
Nonresorbable materials, unretrieved in body4012.2%
Intimal dissection3711.3%
Chest painchest pain185.5%
Surgical procedure, additional185.5%
Deaththe patient died; cause not stated by this term164.9%
Occlusion144.3%
Myocardial infarctionheart attack103.1%
Angina92.8%
Thrombosis92.8%
Low blood pressure/ hypotension61.8%
Stenosis61.8%
Embolism41.2%

Patient problem codes are present mainly in reports filed since 2019 and are often blank.

In context

MeasureAcs Rx Multi-Link Coronary Stent SystemProduct code MAFAll MAUDE reports
Reports32723,27926,136,888
Share of that pool—1.4%0%
Classified as death, per 1,000 reports61769
Classified as injury68.8%51.3%36.2%
Classified as malfunction24.8%40.4%62.3%
Filed by the manufacturer98.8%95.6%94.9%

Shares are of reports, not of devices in use. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Other brands with product code MAF

BrandReportsLatest 12 monthsClassified as death
Graftmaster Rx Coronary Stent Graft System2,163013.1%
Multi-Link Rx Vision Coronary Stent System1,87504.2%
Jostent Graftmaster1,373023.5%
Express2 Monorail Coronary Stent Delivery System88102.5%
Multi-Link Mini Vision Rx Coronary Stent System86704.7%
Liberte' Monorail Coronary Stent Delivery System80203.4%
Multi-Link 862111.6%
Rebel62001.8%
Veriflex Liberte Coronary Stent Delivery System603018.6%
Integrity Rx53308.4%
Graftmaster5681319.9%
Libert41500.7%
Omega35301.4%
Multi-Link Rx Zeta Coronary Stent System35106.6%
Multi-Link Rx Pixel Coronary Stent System32604.3%

Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA also states that "common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product."

Questions about Acs Rx Multi-Link Coronary Stent System reports

How many FDA reports name Acs Rx Multi-Link Coronary Stent System?

327 medical device reports in the openFDA MAUDE release of 28 Sep 2026, covering reports received through August 2026; 6 in the latest 12 months.

What kinds of events are reported?

injury (68.8%), malfunction (24.8%) and death (6.1%). "Event type" is how the report was classified when filed: death, injury, malfunction or other.

What device problems are coded?

dislodged (33.9%), difficult to insert (19.6%), difficult to remove (17.7%), replace (15.3%) and material separation (15%). These are FDA's device problem codes as entered on the report.

Who files these reports?

manufacturer reports (98.8%). Manufacturers and user facilities are required to report; voluntary reports come from health professionals and the public.

Do these reports show that Acs Rx Multi-Link Coronary Stent System was at fault?

No. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." FDA adds that "a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report."

How do I report a problem with a medical device?

Through FDA MedWatch (Form FDA 3500 for health professionals and consumers), or to the manufacturer. See the guide on how to report.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. A report counts here when any device it lists carries this brand name after punctuation and capitalisation are normalised. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.