Devices › Device types
FDA product code PZP · class 2 · General, Plastic Surgery
Fluid jet removal system: medical device reports filed with FDA
1,475 reports carry this product code, 2018–2026; 2 brands with a page.
- 1,475
- reports with this product code
- 0% of all MAUDE reports
- 249
- reports, 12 months to August 2026
- 306 in the 12 months before
- 45.6%
- classified as malfunction
- 62.3% across all reports
- 2.4%
- classified as death, as reported
- 0.9% across all reports
Product code PZP is FDA's classification for "Fluid jet removal system" (general, Plastic Surgery panel), a class 2 device. 1,475 medical device reports carry this product code, 0% of the MAUDE database, from May 2018 to August 2026.
249 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, down 19% from 306 in the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are injury (51.9%), malfunction (45.6%) and death (2.4%). 2 brand names with a page on this site carry this code; the brands table is ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."
Brands with this product code
| Brand | Reports | Latest 12 months | Classified as death | Classified as malfunction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AquaBeam Robotic System | 1,191 | 113 | 2.2% | 46.2% |
| HYDROS Robotic System | 161 | 125 | 3% | 47% |
Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."
Manufacturers named
| Manufacturer (as written on reports) | Reports | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Procept Biorobotics | 1,456 | 98.7% |
Reports by month, five years
FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases.
Event type and report source
Event type
Who filed
Grey bar: all 26,136,888 MAUDE reports.
Device problems coded
| Device problem (FDA code) | Reports | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Visual prompts will not clear | 284 | 19.3% |
| Display or visual feedback problem | 93 | 6.3% |
| Connection problema connection problem | 76 | 5.2% |
| Breakthe device broke | 47 | 3.2% |
| Mechanical problema mechanical problem | 47 | 3.2% |
| No flow | 20 | 1.4% |
| Mechanical jam | 19 | 1.3% |
| Failure to prime | 16 | 1.1% |
| Infusion or flow problema problem with flow or infusion | 14 | 0.9% |
| Failure to align | 13 | 0.9% |
| Audible prompt/feedback problem | 12 | 0.8% |
| Poor quality image | 10 | 0.7% |
| Firing problem | 9 | 0.6% |
| Incomplete or inadequate connection | 9 | 0.6% |
| Material twisted/bent | 9 | 0.6% |
| Output problem | 9 | 0.6% |
| Priming problem | 9 | 0.6% |
| Detachment of device or device componentpart of the device came off | 8 | 0.5% |
| Failure to power up | 8 | 0.5% |
| Moisture damage | 8 | 0.5% |
Questions about fluid jet removal system reports
What is product code PZP?
FDA's classification code for "Fluid jet removal system", class 2, reviewed by the general, Plastic Surgery panel. Every device report carries the product code of the device involved.
How many reports carry this code?
1,475 reports through August 2026, 249 of them in the latest 12 months.
Which brands appear most often?
AquaBeam Robotic System (1,191) and HYDROS Robotic System (161). Widely used products collect more reports because more people use them.
Can the brands table be used to rank the devices?
No. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." Brands differ in how many are in use, how long they have been sold and how reports are collected.
Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.
Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.