Endoscopic ultrasound system, gastroenterology-urology: medical device reports filed with FDA

17,021 reports carry this product code, 2008–2026; 4 brands with a page.

Read first · FDA's statement on these data

Adverse event reports submitted to FDA do not undergo extensive validation or verification. Therefore, a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report. While a suspected relationship may exist, it is not medically validated and should not be the sole source of information for clinical decision making or other assumptions about the safety or efficacy of a product. Additionally, it is important to remember that adverse event reports represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product. Common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product. openFDA, FDA

FDA adds: "Although MDRs are a valuable source of information, this passive surveillance system has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data. In addition, the incidence or prevalence of an event cannot be determined from this reporting system alone due to potential under-reporting of events and lack of information about frequency of device use." And: "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices."

Do not rely on openFDA to make decisions regarding medical care. While we make every effort to ensure that data is accurate, you should assume all results are unvalidated.

Not medical advice. This site counts what was reported to FDA. Questions about a medicine or device belong with a pharmacist or clinician.

17,021
reports with this product code: 0.1% of all MAUDE reports; 8,363
reports, 12 months to August 2026: 1,380 in the 12 months before; 97.9%
classified as malfunction: 62.3% across all reports; 0.2%
classified as death, as reported: 0.9% across all reports

Product code ODG is FDA's classification for "Endoscopic ultrasound system, gastroenterology-urology" (gastroenterology, Urology panel), a class 2 device. 17,021 medical device reports carry this product code, 0.1% of the MAUDE database, from August 2008 to August 2026.

8,363 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, up 506% from 1,380 in the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are malfunction (97.9%), injury (1.9%) and death (0.2%). 4 brand names with a page on this site carry this code; the brands table is ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Brands with this product code

Brand	Reports	Latest 12 months	Classified as death	Classified as malfunction
Evis Lucera Ultrasound Gastrovideoscope	2,498	1,387	0.2%	97%
Ultrasonic Gastrovideoscope	1,869	902	0.2%	97.6%
Evis Eus Ultrasound Gastrointestinal Videoscope	297	159	0%	99.7%
Balloon	1	48	0.3%	71.5%

Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Manufacturers named

Manufacturer (as written on reports)	Reports	Share
Shirakawa Olympus	12,154	71.4%
Hoya Pentax Tokyo Office	2,433	14.3%
Olympus Medical Systems	2,071	12.2%
Boston Scientific - Marlborough	11	0.1%
Olympus Medical Systems Hinode Plant	7	0%

Reports by month, five years

FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases.

Event type and report source

Event type

Death0.2%31

Injury1.9%318

Malfunction97.9%16,667

Other0%5

Not given0%0

Who filed

Manufacturer report99.6%16,954

Voluntary report0%7

User facility report0%0

Distributor report0.3%43

Not given0.1%17

Grey bar: all 26,136,888 MAUDE reports.

Device problems coded

Device problem (FDA code)	Reports	Share
Detachment of device or device componentpart of the device came off	3,004	17.6%
Material split, cut or torn	2,393	14.1%
Peeled/delaminated	2,371	13.9%
Breakthe device broke	1,496	8.8%
Crackthe device cracked	1,413	8.3%
Failure to clean adequately	1,369	8%
Microbial contamination of device	1,043	6.1%
Material separation	882	5.2%
No display/image	758	4.5%
Degraded	757	4.4%
Fluid/blood leak	656	3.9%
Material puncture/hole	617	3.6%
Device reprocessing problem	523	3.1%
Obstruction of flow	492	2.9%
Scratched material	357	2.1%
Corrodedthe device corroded	318	1.9%
Residue after decontamination	303	1.8%
Material fragmentation	296	1.7%
Component missing	295	1.7%
Erratic or intermittent display	235	1.4%

Questions about endoscopic ultrasound system, gastroenterology-urology reports

What is product code ODG?

FDA's classification code for "Endoscopic ultrasound system, gastroenterology-urology", class 2, reviewed by the gastroenterology, Urology panel. Every device report carries the product code of the device involved.

How many reports carry this code?

17,021 reports through August 2026, 8,363 of them in the latest 12 months.

Which brands appear most often?

Evis Lucera Ultrasound Gastrovideoscope (2,498), Ultrasonic Gastrovideoscope (1,869), Evis Eus Ultrasound Gastrointestinal Videoscope (297) and Balloon (1). Widely used products collect more reports because more people use them.

Can the brands table be used to rank the devices?

No. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." Brands differ in how many are in use, how long they have been sold and how reports are collected.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.