Reported Reactions

Adverse event reports that FDA received

  • Search
  • Watch list

Shunt, portosystemic, endoprosthesis medical device reports that FDA received

FDA product code
MIR
Device class
Class 3
Panel
Unknown

What a report is

A report is not proof that the device was the cause of the event.

FDA says:

Adverse event reports submitted to FDA do not undergo extensive validation or verification. Therefore, a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report. While a suspected relationship may exist, it is not medically validated and should not be the sole source of information for clinical decision making or other assumptions about the safety or efficacy of a product. Additionally, it is important to remember that adverse event reports represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product. Common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product.

Source: openFDA, Device Adverse Event Overview, section "Responsible use of the data". The site read the page on . The data have the reports that FDA received through .

FDA also says:

Although MDRs are a valuable source of information, this passive surveillance system has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data. In addition, the incidence or prevalence of an event cannot be determined from this reporting system alone due to potential under-reporting of events and lack of information about frequency of device use.

Source: openFDA, Device Adverse Event Overview. The site read the page on .

MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices.

Source: openFDA, Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience. The site read the page on .

Do not rely on openFDA to make decisions regarding medical care. While we make every effort to ensure that data is accurate, you should assume all results are unvalidated.

Source: openFDA, Response of the drug event API (meta.disclaimer). The site read the page on .

Not medical advice. This site counts what was reported to FDA. Questions about a medicine or device belong with a pharmacist or clinician.

Reports on file

Product code MIR is the FDA classification for Shunt, portosystemic, endoprosthesis. The panel is Unknown. The device class is 3.

From October 1993 to August 2026, FDA received 447 medical device reports that have this product code.

FDA received 20 reports in the 12 months to September 2026 and 32 in the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data every month. Reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases.

Of the 3,444,740 device reports that FDA received in the 12 months to September 2026, 20 (under 0.1%) have this product code. Distributor reports were 0.2% of the reports that have this product code and 3.6% of all device reports.

The number of people who use the product is not in the data. A count is not a rate.

Product code

FDA gives each type of device a product code of three letters. A report has the code of its device, so a code has the reports of each brand of one device type.

Device class

Class I, II or III is the regulatory class of FDA for the device type. It is not a rating of a product.

Data version

openFDA MAUDE release of 23 Oct 2026. Reports received through 30 Sep 2026.

Brand names of this type

Brand names with product code MIR that have a page, in order of name
Brand name, as written on reportsReportsReports, 12 months to September 2026
GORE VIATORR TIPS Endoprosthesis1575

The rows are in order of name. One product can have more than one spelling, and each spelling is a row.

FDA says:

MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices.

Source: openFDA, Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience. The site read the page on .

Manufacturers named

The table has the 2 manufacturers with 5 or more reports that have this product code. The rows are in order of name. A manufacturer with fewer reports is not in the table.

FDA says:

MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices.

Source: openFDA, Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience. The site read the page on .

Manufacturers that the reports with product code MIR name, in order of name
Manufacturer, as written on reportsReports
Cordis8
W L Gore & Associates194

Manufacturers, importers and device user facilities are mandatory reporters. The guide on what affects a count gives FDA's words.

Reports by month

Reports with product code MIR, by month, five years to September 2026
051020222023202420252026

FDA releases MAUDE data every month. Reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases.

Event type and report source

Event type in the reports with product code MIR
Event typeReportsShareShare as a bar
Death255.6%
Injury26258.6%
Malfunction14732.9%
Other102.2%
Not given30.7%
Source of the reports with product code MIR
Report sourceReportsShareShare as a bar
Manufacturer report41993.7%
Voluntary report132.9%
User facility report00%
Distributor report10.2%
Not given143.1%

The event type is the classification that the reporter gave. FDA does not verify it.

Device problems coded

Device problem codes in the reports with product code MIR
Device problem (FDA code)ReportsShare
Device remains implanted347.6%
Dislodged306.7%
Activation failure286.3%
Balloon rupture255.6%
Balloon burst245.4%
Insufficient device problem information224.9%
Replace224.9%
Breakthe device broke204.5%
Positioning failure194.3%
Difficult or delayed positioning184%
Explanted153.4%
Obstruction of flow153.4%
Complete blockage132.9%
Difficult to removethe device was hard to remove132.9%
Migration or expulsion of device132.9%
Occlusion within devicethe device blocked132.9%
Device stenosis122.7%
Fracturea broken bone122.7%
Patient-device incompatibilitythe device did not suit the patient122.7%
Failure to advance92%

Official pages

The site checked these addresses on . The links open in a new tab.

Cite this page

Reported Reactions. Shunt, portosystemic, endoprosthesis (product code MIR): medical device reports that FDA received. https://reportedreactions.com/device-type/mir/ Source: U.S. Food and Drug Administration, openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) files, release of . Reports received through .

Where the data come from

The counts come from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk files, release of 23 Oct 2026. The files have the reports that FDA received through 30 Sep 2026. Brand names, generic names and manufacturer names are as written on the reports. The names of the product codes come from the device classification of FDA.

The site does not publish a report narrative, a lot number, a detail of a patient or the identity of a reporter. The record of FDA is the authority. See how the site counts reports, the data sources and the corrections page.

Questions

What is product code MIR?

It is the FDA classification code for Shunt, portosystemic, endoprosthesis, class 3, in the Unknown panel. Each device report has the product code of the device.

What event types do the reports record?

Death (25), injury (262), malfunction (147) and other (10). The event type is the classification that the reporter gave. FDA does not verify it.

Can the table of brand names rank the devices?

No. FDA says:

MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices.

Source: openFDA, Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience. The site read the page on .

Brands also differ in the number of devices in use and in their time on the market.