Laser, ophthalmic: medical device reports filed with FDA

1,529 reports carry this product code, 1992–2026; 7 brands with a page.

Read first · FDA's statement on these data

Adverse event reports submitted to FDA do not undergo extensive validation or verification. Therefore, a causal relationship cannot be established between product and reactions listed in a report. While a suspected relationship may exist, it is not medically validated and should not be the sole source of information for clinical decision making or other assumptions about the safety or efficacy of a product. Additionally, it is important to remember that adverse event reports represent a small percentage of total usage numbers of a product. Common products may have a higher number of adverse events due to the higher total number of people using the product. openFDA, FDA

FDA adds: "Although MDRs are a valuable source of information, this passive surveillance system has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data. In addition, the incidence or prevalence of an event cannot be determined from this reporting system alone due to potential under-reporting of events and lack of information about frequency of device use." And: "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices."

Do not rely on openFDA to make decisions regarding medical care. While we make every effort to ensure that data is accurate, you should assume all results are unvalidated.

Not medical advice. This site counts what was reported to FDA. Questions about a medicine or device belong with a pharmacist or clinician.

1,529
reports with this product code: 0% of all MAUDE reports; 78
reports, 12 months to August 2026: 111 in the 12 months before; 68.8%
classified as malfunction: 62.3% across all reports; 0%
classified as death, as reported: 0.9% across all reports

Product code HQF is FDA's classification for "Laser, ophthalmic" (ophthalmic panel), a class 2 device. 1,529 medical device reports carry this product code, 0% of the MAUDE database, from July 1992 to August 2026.

78 reports arrived in the 12 months to August 2026, down 30% from 111 in the 12 months before. FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases. The event types recorded are malfunction (68.8%), injury (28.1%) and other (2.2%). 7 brand names with a page on this site carry this code; the brands table is ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Brands with this product code

Brand	Reports	Latest 12 months	Classified as death	Classified as malfunction
PurePoint Laser	666	57	0%	96.1%
Intralase Fs Laser	93	0	0%	2.9%
Ophthalas 532 Eyelite Laser System	13	0	0%	85.7%
Lasik	5	7	1.2%	1.8%
Alcon	1	2	0%	36.7%
Millennium Microsurgical System	1	0	0%	53.3%
Stellaris Pc Vision Enhancement System	1	1	0%	83.6%

Ordered by report count for navigation only. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data."

Manufacturers named

Manufacturer (as written on reports)	Reports	Share
Alcon Research - Irvine Technology Center	682	44.6%
Alcon - Irvine Technology Center	153	10%
Alcon - Irvine Technology Ctr	22	1.4%
Alcon Laboratories	19	1.2%
Lumenis	14	0.9%
Amo Manufacturing USA	4	0.3%
Abbott Medical Optics	1	0.1%
Bausch + Lomb	1	0.1%

Reports by month, five years

FDA releases MAUDE data monthly; reports can arrive months after an event, so the newest months grow in later releases.

Event type and report source

Event type

Death0%0

Injury28.1%430

Malfunction68.8%1,052

Other2.2%34

Not given0.9%13

Who filed

Manufacturer report89.3%1,366

Voluntary report6.2%95

User facility report0%0

Distributor report0.5%8

Not given3.9%60

Grey bar: all 26,136,888 MAUDE reports.

Device problems coded

Device problem (FDA code)	Reports	Share
Energy output problem	227	14.8%
Device operates differently than expectedthe device behaved unexpectedly	117	7.7%
Failure to fire	106	6.9%
Normal	73	4.8%
Power problem	72	4.7%
Device displays incorrect message	60	3.9%
Output below specifications	48	3.1%
Failure to deliver energy	46	3%
Loss of powerthe device lost power	42	2.7%
Insufficient device problem information	33	2.2%
Device operational issue	32	2.1%
Output problem	24	1.6%
Device inoperablethe device could not be used	23	1.5%
Unexpected therapeutic results	20	1.3%
Nonstandard device	16	1%
Unexpected shutdown	16	1%
Breakthe device broke	14	0.9%
Other (for use when an appropriate device code cannot be identified)	14	0.9%
Defective component	12	0.8%
Electrical /electronic property probleman electrical or electronic problem	12	0.8%

Questions about laser, ophthalmic reports

What is product code HQF?

FDA's classification code for "Laser, ophthalmic", class 2, reviewed by the ophthalmic panel. Every device report carries the product code of the device involved.

How many reports carry this code?

1,529 reports through August 2026, 78 of them in the latest 12 months.

Which brands appear most often?

PurePoint Laser (666), Intralase Fs Laser (93), Ophthalas 532 Eyelite Laser System (13), Lasik (5) and Alcon (1). Widely used products collect more reports because more people use them.

Can the brands table be used to rank the devices?

No. FDA states that "MDR data alone cannot be used to establish rates of events, evaluate a change in event rates over time or compare event rates between devices. The number of reports cannot be interpreted or used in isolation to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, or frequency of problems associated with devices." It adds that the reporting system "has limitations, including the potential submission of incomplete, inaccurate, untimely, unverified, or biased data." Brands differ in how many are in use, how long they have been sold and how reports are collected.

Where this comes from. Counts are built from the openFDA Device Adverse Event (MAUDE) bulk export released 28 Sep 2026, which holds reports FDA received through 31 Aug 2026. Brand, generic and manufacturer names are as written on the reports; product code names come from FDA's device classification. No report narrative, lot number, patient detail or reporter identity is published. See the methodology and sources; FDA's record is authoritative, and corrections are handled within five working days.

Drug data (FAERS) through 30 Jun 2026; device data (MAUDE) through 31 Aug 2026. Not medical advice.